UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 624/2025

Jul 4, 2025·EP4344633: ANALYTE SENSOR METHODS

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional Measures
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Christian Dekoninck (Taylor Wessing)
Respondents
Reps: Tjibbe Douma; Edoardo Barbera
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Language
English
First decided
Oct 17, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-10-17
    PI grantedPreliminary injunctionApplication for provisional measures

    The Hague Local Division granted Abbott Diabetes Care a preliminary injunction against Sinocare and A.Menarini Diagnostics regarding infringement of continuous glucose monitoring patent EP 4 344 633 (FreeStyle Libre technology), including information orders and delivery-up of infringing GlucoMen iCan products.

    Legal issues:Preliminary injunction (continuous glucose monitoring)Claim construction of timeline graph featureProportionality of measures
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Receipt2026-03-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-30Not public
Application document Claimant2026-03-30Not public
action.communication.general2025-11-14Not public
action.communication.general2025-11-05Not public
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-10-23Not public
action.publishOrderDecision.order2025-10-17Not public
action.issueDecision.decision2025-10-17Not public
Final Order2025-10-17Public
action.phaseChange.oralPhaseClose2025-10-14Not public
ORAL_HEARING_REFERENCING_32414_2025_OH_HAG_LOC_UPC2025090309am2025-09-10Not public
ORAL_HEARING_REFERENCING_32414_2025_OH_HAG_LOC_UPC2025090309am2025-09-10Not public
Summon-Oral-Hearing2025-08-31Not public
Annex E32025-08-25Not public
Reply to the Objection EP 6332025-08-25Not public
Opportunity to upload response and OH agenda2025-08-21Public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-08-19Not public
Objection to Application2025-08-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB262025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB382025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB022025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB152025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB052025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB212025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB172025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB392025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB072025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB412025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB142025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB08D2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB33C2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB322025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB292025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB302025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB242025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB192025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB032025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB33D2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB072025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB34A2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB062025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB122025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB372025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB202025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB162025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB222025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB33B2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB31A2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB282025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB08A2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB282025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB08B2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB08C2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB402025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB182025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB102025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB232025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB132025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB33A2025-08-19Not public
Objection Abbott v Sinocare and Menarini EP633 PI2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB272025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB012025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB092025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB042025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB34B2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB31B2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB35A2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB112025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB362025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB292025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB252025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB35B2025-08-19Not public
Exhibit BB042025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB132025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB122025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB112025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB152025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB402025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB182025-08-18Not public
Formal response to the Order of the Court Objection EP6332025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB052025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB162025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB252025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB242025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB31B2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB33D2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB31A2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB172025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB272025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB032025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB35A2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB232025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB33C2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB212025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB392025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB012025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB222025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB292025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB34B2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB382025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB282025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB072025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB322025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB08A2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB202025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB35B2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB102025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB292025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB142025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB092025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB08C2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB34A2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB302025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB08D2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB412025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB062025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB372025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB022025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB072025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB33A2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB192025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB362025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB262025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB282025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB33B2025-08-18Not public
Exhibit BB08B2025-08-18Not public
Objection to Application2025-08-18Not public
completing workfow2025-08-15Public
completing workfow2025-08-15Public
Notification Of Service2025-08-07Not public
2025_08_05 Confirmation of Service ACT_32414_2025 UPC_CFI_624_2025 Sinocare Inc2025-08-07Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-08-05Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-08-01Not public
R.9 order2025-08-01Public
Template-Order2025-08-01Not public
Annex 32025-07-30Not public
Annex 52025-07-30Not public
Annex 22025-07-30Not public
Annex 62025-07-30Not public
Annex 12025-07-30Not public
Annex 42025-07-30Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-30Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-07-30Not public
opportunity to comment2025-07-29Not public
Receipt2025-07-29Not public
Rule 9 Application2025-07-28Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-07-28Not public
Letter-for-Service2025-07-18Not public
Notification Of Service2025-07-17Not public
20250716 ACT_32414_2025 UPC_CFI_624_2025 Confirmation of service2025-07-17Not public
Letter-for-Service2025-07-14Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-07-10Not public
Notice-to-Accompany-Service-of-Order-for-Measures2025-07-09Not public
Notice-to-Accompany-Service-of-Order-for-Measures2025-07-09Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-07-09Not public
Application-For-Measures-Receipt2025-07-09Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-07-09Not public
Annex E2 - part 2 (incl JK-1 to JK-10)2025-07-08Not public
Annex C12025-07-08Not public
Formal response to the request for amendments2025-07-08Not public
Annex D42025-07-08Not public
Annex D62025-07-08Not public
Annex D72025-07-08Not public
Annex B12025-07-08Not public
Annex B22025-07-08Not public
Annex E12025-07-08Not public
Annex A12025-07-08Not public
Annex D12025-07-08Not public
Annex D32025-07-08Not public
Annex D52025-07-08Not public
Annex E2 - part 1 (incl JK-1)2025-07-08Not public
Application for Provisional Measures2025-07-08Not public
Annex D22025-07-08Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2025-07-08Not public
Application-For-Measures-Acknowledgement2025-07-08Not public
Annex D22025-07-08Not public
Annex E2 - part 2 (incl JK-1 to JK-10)2025-07-08Not public
Annex B22025-07-08Not public
Annex D52025-07-08Not public
Annex D72025-07-08Not public
Annex E12025-07-08Not public
Annex B12025-07-08Not public
Annex C12025-07-08Not public
Annex D32025-07-08Not public
Annex D42025-07-08Not public
Annex D62025-07-08Not public
Annex A12025-07-08Not public
Annex D12025-07-08Not public
Application for Provisional Measures2025-07-08Not public
Annex E2 - part 1 (incl JK-1)2025-07-08Not public
Coverage: Partial.Reasoning extracted with partial coverage — some sections may be incomplete.
Plain-English summary

Abbott Diabetes Care obtained a preliminary injunction from The Hague Local Division against Sinocare and A. Menarini Diagnostics prohibiting the GlucoMen iCan CGM system across all UPC territories for infringement of EP 4 344 633 (FreeStyle Libre analyte sensor technology). The court also ordered delivery-up of infringing products and disclosure of distribution channels, but rejected Abbott's request for a customs-goods declaration under EU Regulation 608/2013 as unavailable in PI proceedings, and limited the information order to distribution data rather than financial figures.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • GlucoMen iCan infringes EP 4 344 633 covering continuous glucose monitoring sensor technology

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 62 UPCA; R. 211 RoP

    Note: The Hague Local Division found infringement sufficiently demonstrated for PI purposes and granted the injunction across all UPC member states.

  • Defendants should not be ordered to comply jointly and severally as independent companies

    Respondent

    Note: Court agreed that Sinocare and Menarini are independent companies and did not impose joint and several liability for the substantive injunction obligations.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Declaration that GlucoMen iCan is 'goods suspected of infringing an IP right' under EU Regulation 608/2013 should be granted as a provisional measure

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 2(7)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 608/2013

    Reason: Court held that such a declaration is not available as a provisional measure regardless of the merits.

  • Information order should include price, sales numbers, and cost data

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 211 RoP

    Reason: Court found that financial data is only relevant for damages calculation which is premature at the PI stage; the information order was limited to distribution channels and product origins.

  • Information disclosure should be subject to confidentiality

    Respondent

    Reason: Court rejected confidentiality request given the limited scope of the ordered information disclosure.