UPC CFI 665/2025
Aug 5, 2025·EP2403266 · Portable terminal, information processing apparatus, content display system and content display method
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Patent revoked)ActionCounterclaim for revocationCategoryCounterclaim for revocation
- Parties
- Claimants
- Samsung Electronics Benelux B.V.Operating co.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Operating co.
- Samsung Electronics GmbHOperating co.
- Samsung Electronics Italia S.p.A.Operating co.
- Samsung Electronics France S.A.S.Operating co.
Representatives- Christian Lederer-PENTARC Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Jan Phillip Rektorschek-PENTARC Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Tobias Baus-PENTARC Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Julia Fischer-PENTARC Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Martin Kuschel-PAUSTIAN
- Christoph Hewel-PAUSTIAN
Respondents- Maxell, Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Benjamin Beck-Mayer Brown LLP
- Christoph Crützen-Mayer Brown LLP
- Alexander Balan-Mayer Brown LLP
- Svenja Schenk-Mayer Brown LLP
- Thomas Hell-Bosch Jehle Patentanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology · Telecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- May 5, 2026
- Last decision
- Sep 22, 2026
| Patent revoked | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 37% (34/91) | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Johansson | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Hergen Kapels | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Samsung Group (57 cases)·Maxell, Ltd. (11 cases)
This dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CoA 178/2026·UPC CoA 179/2026·UPC CFI 251/2025·UPC CFI 196/2025·UPC APP 19188/2025
- 2026-09-22Counter claim for revocationPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division revoked Maxell's EP 2 403 266 in its entirety on Samsung's counterclaim (UPC_CFI_665/2025), holding claim 1 obvious over D1 and D10 for the patent as granted and every auxiliary request, with auxiliary requests 12 and 13 also adding matter; the infringement action was therefore dismissed and Maxell ordered to pay Samsung the agreed EUR 620,000 in costs.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Inventive step: claim 1 obvious over D1 in combination with D10, as granted and for all auxiliary requests examined
- Unallowable added matter (Art. 138(1)(c) EPC) in auxiliary requests 12 and 13 (UTF-8-encoded display state information)
- Infringement action dismissed as a consequence of revocation
- Costs award by party agreement: EUR 600,000 representation costs plus EUR 20,000 court fee
- 2026-05-05Counterclaim for revocationPublic
Summary: The court issued a rectified order summarising the interim conference held on 30 April 2026. The order sets the value of the infringement action at EUR 2,000,000 and the counterclaim for revocation at EUR 3,000,000, and sets out procedural agreements on limiting invalidity attacks and auxiliary requests, scheduling the oral hearing for 23 July 2026, and other case management matters.
Show the legal issues (6)
- Case value determination for infringement action and counterclaim
- Limitation of invalidity attacks and auxiliary requests
- Scheduling of oral hearing
- Confidentiality of register entries under R. 262.2 RoP
- Avertment of enforcement by security under Art. 62.1 UPCA and Art. 63 UPCA
- Admissibility of exhibit and FRAND defence
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Publication of decision | 2026-09-22 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-09-22 | Public |
| Case closed | 2026-09-21 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-09-21 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-09-21 | Not public |
| Deliberation opened | 2026-07-27 | Not public |
| Hearing recording reference document | 2026-07-24 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-07-13 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-07-13 | Not public |
| Further pleadings | 2026-07-13 | Not public |
Claim 1 as granted and as amended by the auxiliary requests (incl. 9b and 9c) lacks inventive step over D1 in combination with D10
RespondentLegal basis: Art. 56 EPC, Art. 138(1)(a) EPCAuxiliary requests 12 and 13 add subject matter: the application discloses display state information indicating a UTF-8 character encoding item, not that the display state information itself is UTF-8-encoded
RespondentLegal basis: Art. 123(2) EPC, Art. 138(1)(c) EPC
The patent as granted or as amended by an auxiliary request is valid and infringed
ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 138 EPC; Art. 25 UPCA