UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 676/2025

Jul 24, 2025·EP3072324 +1 more · HIGH-EFFICIENCY WLAN (HEW) MASTER STATION AND METHODS TO INCREASE INFORMATION BITS FOR HEW COMMUNICATION

Case details
Status
Interim Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
Oct 17, 2025
Last decision
Oct 12, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Matthias ZigannLockedLocked
Judge Rute LopesLockedLocked
Judge Ina SchnurrLockedLocked
Judge Alessandro SanchiniLockedLocked

At the UPC: AX Wireless, LLC (4 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)

Related cases
Decisions
  • 2026-10-12
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: Order of the Judge-Rapporteur (Munich Local Division) summarising the interim conference in two parallel actions between AX Wireless and Xiaomi: sets the value of each infringement action at EUR 1 million and each revocation counterclaim at EUR 1.5 million, deadlines of 26 October 2026 on costs allocation and on responses to late-filing objections, and the agenda for the oral hearing on 19-20 January 2027. No substantive ruling.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Interim conference, R. 105.5 RoP
    • Case value and ceiling for recoverable costs (EUR 400,000 per case)
    • FRAND-related defence (to be heard at oral hearing)
    • Admissibility of late filings
    • Conditional counterclaim for revocation
  • 2026-10-08
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Munich Local Division's judge-rapporteur ruled on the admissibility of late submissions in the interim procedure. Passages of the defendants' rejoinder on the application to amend (Section A, mn. 5-7 and 9-13) and claimant exhibits AMPER CC 5 and CC 6 are inadmissible and disregarded; the other requests are dismissed. No ruling on infringement or validity.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Scope of rejoinders (R. 29(e) and R. 32.3 RoP)
    • Admissibility of new arguments in a rejoinder to the reply to the defence to an application to amend the patent
    • Late-filed exhibits disregarded under R. 9.2 RoP
    • Front-loaded procedure
    • Application under R. 336 in the interim procedure
  • 2026-10-08
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: Munich LD judge-rapporteur grants the defendants' request for a refund of EUR 4,900 of the counterclaim-for-revocation fee, holding the fee is the same as the infringement-action fee (EUR 15,000) under the old Table of Court Fees because the action was filed before 31 December 2025. No substantive patent ruling.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Refund of court fee for counterclaim for revocation
    • Transitional application of amended Table of Court Fees (filed before 1 January 2026)
    • Counterclaim fee equals infringement action fee
  • 2025-10-17
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Munich Local Division granted the defendants' request to extend and align procedural deadlines (preliminary objection and statement of defence) for all Xiaomi defendants, to match the later statutory deadlines applicable to the Chinese defendants who accepted service voluntarily.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Extension and alignment of procedural deadlines
    • Service on Chinese defendants
    • Efficient case management
Document titleDatePublic
Publication of order2026-10-20Not public
Publication of order2026-10-20Not public
Publication of order2026-10-20Not public
Receipt2026-10-15Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-15Not public
Document2026-10-15Not public
Order2026-10-12Not public
Order2026-10-12Public
Order2026-10-12Not public
Other Documents2026-10-09Not public