UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CFI 692/2026

EP3757442 · DISPLAY MODULE FOR A TEMPORARY EXHIBITION STAND

Follow
Case details
Status
—
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional measures
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Judges
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Mechanical elements
Language
—
First decided
Feb 25, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Preliminary injunction grantedMedian days to first decision
All UPC54% (38/70)124
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked
Judge Berenice ThomLockedLocked
Judge Jule SchumacherLockedLocked

At the UPC: beMatrix NV (1 case)·Yaham Recience Technology Co., Ltd. (1 case)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2026

Decisions
  • 2026-02-25
    Application for provisional measuresPublic

    Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division granted provisional measures (preliminary injunction) against Yaham Recience Technology for infringement of EP 3 757 442 B1 (LED display module for temporary exhibition stands). The order was issued ex parte during the EuroShop trade fair in Düsseldorf, with penalty payments ordered for non-compliance and provisional cost reimbursement of EUR 400,000.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Provisional measures ex parte (R. 209, 212 RoP)
    • Patent infringement at trade fair
    • LED display module for exhibition stands
    • Penalty payment
    • Provisional cost reimbursement
Documents
  • Order_UPC_CFI_692-2026_anonymized.pdf2026-02-25EN
Coverage: Thin.Reasoning extracted with limited coverage — see decisions tab for full text.
Plain-English summary

beMatrix NV obtained an ex parte preliminary injunction from the Düsseldorf Local Division against Yaham Recience Technology Co. Ltd. during the EuroShop 2026 trade fair in Düsseldorf, for infringement of EP 3 757 442 B1 (a display module for modular temporary exhibition stands with LED screens). A penalty of up to EUR 400,000 was ordered for non-compliance. A clerical error in the order naming the applicant instead of the defendant was corrected on the same day under R. 353 RoP.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.

  • Ex parte preliminary injunction warranted for patent infringement at EuroShop trade fair

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 209.1, 212 RoP

    Note: Düsseldorf LD granted an ex parte PI against Yaham Recience Technology exhibiting at EuroShop trade fair for infringement of EP 3 757 442 B1 (LED display module).

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

No rejected arguments captured.

Key legal principles
Doctrines and rules cited in the reasoning.
Ex parte provisional measures available at trade fair exhibitions for urgent patent infringementRectification of clerical errors under R. 353 RoP where wrong party named in order

Browse other cases on this principle.