UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 714/2025

Oct 9, 2025·EP4283140 Unitary patent · FASTENING ELEMENT MADE OF WOOD AND/OR WOODEN MATERIALS

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent partly revoked)
Action
Revocation
Category
Main revocation action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Munich CD
Technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Mechanical elements
Language
German
First decided
Jul 21, 2026
EPO Opposition
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Munich CDLockedLocked
Judge András KupeczLockedLocked
Judge Thomas AdockerLockedLocked
Judge Beate SchenkLockedLocked

At the UPC: Raimund Beck Nageltechnik GmbH (3 cases)·BAUSSMANN Collated Fasteners GmbH (5 cases)

This dispute contains 1 other proceedings

UPC CFI 3019/2026

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 160/2026

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich CD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-07-21
    RevocationPublic

    Summary: The European patent with unitary effect EP 4 283 140 B1 was partially declared invalid, limited to Auxiliary Request I (with claims 3, 4, 6 and 7 remaining in their granted form). The infringement action was otherwise dismissed. The defendant bears 70% of the costs and the claimant bears 30%.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Novelty of a device claim defined by structural features
    • Whether a device claim limited to structural features is restricted to performing a specific function
    • Obvious typographical error in prior art
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Receipt2026-08-21Not public
Cover sheet2026-08-21Not public
Receipt2026-08-21Not public
Cover sheet2026-08-21Not public
Application Respondent2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Respondent2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Respondent2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-08-21Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-08-21Not public
Application document Applicant2026-08-21Not public
Publication of decision2026-07-21Not public
Decision2026-07-21Public
Final Order2026-07-21Public
Case closed2026-07-21Not public
Oral procedure closed2026-07-21Not public
Decision2026-07-21Not public
Decision2026-07-21Not public
Communication2026-07-14Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-06-16Not public
Communication2026-06-10Not public
Other Documents2026-06-10Not public
Receipt2026-05-29Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-29Not public
Submission Defendant2026-05-29Not public
Receipt2026-05-29Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-29Not public
Submission Claimant2026-05-29Not public
Receipt2026-05-19Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-19Not public
Further pleadings2026-05-19Not public
Summons to oral hearing2026-05-11Not public
Summons2026-05-11Not public
Oral procedure opened2026-05-06Not public
Interim procedure closed2026-05-06Not public
Receipt2026-05-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Submission Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Receipt2026-05-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Submission Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Receipt2026-04-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-30Not public
Document Claimant2026-04-30Not public
Order2026-03-25Public
Order2026-03-24Not public
Order2026-03-24Not public
Communication2026-03-13Not public
Interim procedure opened2026-03-06Not public
Written procedure closed2026-03-06Not public
Order2026-03-05Public
Order2026-03-05Not public
Order2026-03-05Not public
Communication2026-02-16Not public
Receipt2026-02-13Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-13Not public
Document Defendant2026-02-13Not public
Receipt2026-02-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-12Not public
Document Claimant2026-02-12Not public
Communication2026-02-11Not public
Receipt2026-02-10Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-10Not public
Other document Claimant2026-02-10Not public
Receipt2026-02-06Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-06Not public
Other document Defendant2026-02-06Not public
Receipt2026-02-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-05Not public
Other document Claimant2026-02-05Not public
Communication2026-02-03Not public
Receipt2026-02-03Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-03Not public
Statement of rejoinder2026-02-03Not public
Statement of rejoinder2026-02-03Not public
Receipt2026-01-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-05Not public
Statement of rejoinder2026-01-05Not public
Receipt2026-01-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-05Not public
Statement of rejoinder2026-01-05Not public
Communication2025-12-05Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-05Not public
Other document Claimant2025-12-05Not public
Other document Claimant2025-12-05Not public
Receipt2025-12-05Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-05Not public
Statement of reply2025-12-05Not public
Receipt2025-12-05Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-09Not public
Other document2025-10-09Not public
Receipt2025-10-09Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-09Not public
Other document2025-10-09Not public
Receipt2025-10-09Not public
Formal Deficiency found2025-10-09Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-08Not public
Application2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Receipt2025-10-08Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-08Not public
Statement of defence2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Exhibit2025-10-08Not public
Receipt2025-10-08Not public
Notification Of Service2025-08-13Not public
Friendly Mail2025-08-13Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-08-12Not public
EPO_Communication_check_Outcome2025-08-11Not public
Document from EPO2025-08-11Not public
EPO_Communication_check_Outcome2025-08-11Not public
EPO_Communication_check_Outcome2025-08-11Not public
Document from EPO2025-08-11Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-08-10Not public
Document from EPO2025-08-08Not public
Letter-for-Service2025-08-08Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-08-07Not public
EPO-Request-for-case-pending2025-08-07Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-08-07Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-08-07Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 42025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 132025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 112025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 72025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 102025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 82025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 62025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlagenliste2025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 32025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Klage auf Nichtigerklärung2025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Zahlungsnachweis2025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 92025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 12025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 52025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 22025-08-05Not public
125 0204 Anlage P&A 122025-08-05Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • A device claim defined by structural features is not limited to the device performing a specific function; if prior art discloses a device fulfilling all structural features and suitable for the claimed purpose, novelty is lacking even if not all technical effects are realized in the same way

    RespondentLegal basis: Novelty assessment under UPC patent law
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • The prior art contains an obvious typographical error such that the relevant term should be read differently, preserving novelty

    ClaimantLegal basis: Interpretation of prior art disclosures