UPC CFI 716/2025
Aug 7, 2025·EP3258692 SEP +1 more · METHOD FOR INDUCING PREDICTION MOTION VECTOR AND CORRESPONDING APPARATUSES
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Settled)ActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Electronics and Telecommunications Research InstituteUniversity / research
Representatives- Tilman Mueller-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Volkmar Henke-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Georg Anetsberger-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- Hisense Gorenje Germany GmbHOperating co.
- ATAG Nederland B.V.Operating co.
- Gorenje gospodinjski aparati, d.o.oOperating co.
- Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd.Operating co.
- Hisense France SASOperating co.
- Hisense Italia S.r.l.Operating co.
Representatives - Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- InstrumentsMeasurement
- ChemistryOrganic fine chemistry
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Feb 16, 2026
- Last decision
- Apr 27, 2026
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Ronny Thomas | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Johansson | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (7 cases)·Hisense Group (18 cases)
4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 2051/2025·UPC CFI 1522/2025·UPC CFI 648/2025·UPC CFI 1653/2026
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
- 2026-04-27Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Court rectified section V of the order in its earlier decision of 16 February 2026 on its own motion under R. 353 RoP, correcting a calculation error. The correct amount for 60% of the court fees is €18,600, not €14,400 as originally stated. No substantive patent ruling was made in this rectification decision.
Show the legal issues (1)
- Rectification of clerical/calculation error in court fees order under R. 353 RoP
- 2026-02-16Application RoP 265Public
Summary: Decision permitting ETRI's withdrawal of the infringement action (EP 2 258 692 B1 / EP 3 258 692 B1) against Hisense Gorenje and others following a settlement. Each party bears its own costs. 60% of court fees (EUR 14,400) reimbursed to Claimant. Value in dispute set at EUR 2,500,000.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Withdrawal of action by settlement (Rule 265 RoP)
- Reimbursement of court fees upon settlement (Rule 370.11, 370.9(b)(i) RoP)
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Decision | 2026-04-27 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-04-27 | Public |
| Case closed | 2026-02-17 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-02-16 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-02-16 | Public |
| Receipt | 2026-01-30 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-01-30 | Not public |
| Further pleadings | 2026-01-30 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-01-30 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-01-30 | Not public |
ETRI's infringement action against Hisense Gorenje and related entities concerning video codec patent EP 3 258 692 B1 was withdrawn following a settlement, with the Düsseldorf Local Division declaring proceedings closed, setting the value in dispute at EUR 2,500,000, and ordering 60% reimbursement of court fees (EUR 14,400) to ETRI, with each party bearing its own costs.
No accepted arguments captured.
No rejected arguments captured.