View all cases
UPC CFI 729/2025
Aug 11, 2025·EP3614263 Unitary patent · A COMPUTER CLUSTER ARRANGEMENT FOR PROCESSING A COMPUTATION TASK AND METHOD FOR OPERATION THEREOF
- Case details
- StatusWritten PhaseActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- BF exaQC AGNPE
- ParTec AGOperating co.
Representatives- Rajvinder Jagdev-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Peter Fitzpatrick-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
Respondents- NVIDIA CorporationOperating co.
- NVIDIA GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Johannes Heselberger-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Oct 28, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- NVIDIA CorporationAdmissible2026-03-25
- BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbB Patentanwälte, RechtsanwälteAdmissible2026-03-25
- Advanced Micro Devices GmbH2026-09-03
- Lenovo Global Technology Germany GmbH2026-09-16
- Google LLC2026-10-01
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Daniel Voss | Locked | Locked |
| Judge András Kupecz | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Georg Werner | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Alain Dumont | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: BF exaQC AG (13 cases)·NVIDIA Corporation (11 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 2 other proceedings
7 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 3644/2026·UPC CFI 2469/2026·UPC CFI 2082/2026·UPC CFI 1970/2026·UPC CFI 1815/2026 and 2 more
Decisions
- 2025-10-28Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division ordered Claimant 2 (ParTec AG) to provide security for costs of EUR 85,000 in favour of the defendants, finding insufficient evidence of ParTec's financial capacity; the application against Claimant 1 (BFexaQC AG) was rejected for lack of any financial information.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Security for costs including potential future counterclaim for revocation
- Financial capacity of claimant
- Pro rata liability for costs among multiple claimants
Documents
Show all 321 documents| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Receipt | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Exhibit Defendant | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Exhibit Defendant | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Document Defendant | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-09-11 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-09-11 | Not public |
| Submission Claimant | 2026-09-11 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-08-31 | Not public |
| Other Documents | 2026-08-31 | Not public |