UPC CFI 739/2026
Sep 30, 2025·EP4250732 Unitary patent · MOTION PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionCounterclaim for revocationCategoryCounterclaim for revocation
- Parties
- Claimants
- VIMN Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Paramount Home Entertainment (Germany) GmbHOperating co.
- Paramount Pictures Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Paramount Global Streaming International LLCOperating co.
- Viacom International Inc.Operating co.
- Paramount Pictures International Ltd.Operating co.
- Paramount Global Italia S.r.l.Operating co.
- Paramount Global Inc.Operating co.
- Paramount Skydance CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Benjamin Schröer-Hogan Lovells International LLP
Respondents- Nokia Technologies OyOperating co.
Representatives- Cordula Julia Schumacher-Arnold Ruess
- Arno Eberhard Riße-Arnold Ruess
- Jan Wergin-Arnold Ruess
- Tim Smentkowski-Arnold Ruess
- Charlotte Josephine Meis
- Anja Katharina Penners
- Sophia Jiayi Zeng
- Victoria Thüsing-Arnold Ruess
- Tuğçe Altun-Arnold Ruess
- Christoph Walke-Cohausz & Florack
- Lars Grannemann
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Mar 27, 2026
| Patent revoked | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 37% (34/91) | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Walter Schober | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: VIMN Germany GmbH (2 cases)·Nokia Group (30 cases)
This dispute contains 1 other proceedings
13 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 384/2026·UPC CFI 1390/2025·UPC CFI 289/2025·UPC CFI 293/2025·UPC CFI 294/2025 and 8 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2026
- 2026-03-27Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The court issued a correction order (Berichtigung) rectifying an obvious clerical error in item 7 of its decision of 27 March 2026. The reimbursement of court fees to the defendants for the invalidity counterclaim was corrected from 60% (EUR 12,000) to the correct 50% (EUR 13,250), applying the new fee schedule with a cap of EUR 26,500.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Correction of clerical error in court fee reimbursement order (R. 353 RoP)
- Court fee reimbursement for invalidity counterclaim following withdrawal of infringement action (R. 265, R. 370.9 RoP)
- Application of new fee schedule and cap (EUR 26,500) to invalidity counterclaim fees
- 2026-03-27Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: Both the claimant's infringement action and the respondents' invalidity counterclaim were withdrawn before the close of the written procedure, with mutual consent of the opposing parties. No costs order was made. The court directed partial reimbursement of court fees: 60% to the claimant (EUR 18,600) and 60% to the respondents (EUR 12,000), applying R. 370.9 RoP under the version in force at the time each action was filed.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Withdrawal of infringement action (R. 265 RoP)
- Withdrawal of invalidity counterclaim (R. 265 RoP)
- Partial reimbursement of court fees on early termination (R. 370.9 RoP)
- Transitional application of amended fee rules: which version of R. 370.9 applies to actions filed before vs. after 31 December 2025
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2026-04-15 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-03-27 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-03-27 | Public |
| Receipt | 2026-03-27 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-03-27 | Not public |
| Exhibit Claimant | 2026-03-27 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2026-03-27 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-03-27 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-03-27 | Public |
| Receipt | 2026-03-19 | Not public |