UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 975/2025

Sep 30, 2025·EP4250732 Unitary patent · MOTION PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Withdrawn)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Mannheim LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
Language
German
First decided
Mar 27, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Mannheim LDLockedLocked
Judge Peter TochtermannLockedLocked
Judge Dirk BöttcherLockedLocked
Judge Walter SchoberLockedLocked

At the UPC: Nokia Group (30 cases)·VIMN Germany GmbH (2 cases)

This dispute contains 1 other proceedings

UPC CFI 739/2026

13 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 384/2026·UPC CFI 1390/2025·UPC CFI 289/2025·UPC CFI 293/2025·UPC CFI 294/2025 and 8 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Mannheim LD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-03-27
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The court issued a correction order (Berichtigung) rectifying an obvious clerical error in item 7 of its decision of 27 March 2026. The reimbursement of court fees to the defendants for the invalidity counterclaim was corrected from 60% (EUR 12,000) to the correct 50% (EUR 13,250), applying the new fee schedule with a cap of EUR 26,500.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Correction of clerical error in court fee reimbursement order (R. 353 RoP)
    • Court fee reimbursement for invalidity counterclaim following withdrawal of infringement action (R. 265, R. 370.9 RoP)
    • Application of new fee schedule and cap (EUR 26,500) to invalidity counterclaim fees
  • 2026-03-27
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: Both the claimant's infringement action and the respondents' invalidity counterclaim were withdrawn before the close of the written procedure, with mutual consent of the opposing parties. No costs order was made. The court directed partial reimbursement of court fees: 60% to the claimant (EUR 18,600) and 60% to the respondents (EUR 12,000), applying R. 370.9 RoP under the version in force at the time each action was filed.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Withdrawal of infringement action (R. 265 RoP)
    • Withdrawal of invalidity counterclaim (R. 265 RoP)
    • Partial reimbursement of court fees on early termination (R. 370.9 RoP)
    • Transitional application of amended fee rules: which version of R. 370.9 applies to actions filed before vs. after 31 December 2025
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-04-15Not public
Order2026-03-27Not public
Order2026-03-27Public
Decision2026-03-27Not public
Decision2026-03-27Public
Communication2026-03-25Not public
Receipt2026-03-20Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-20Not public
Document Defendant2026-03-20Not public
Communication2026-03-19Not public