UPC CFI 758/2024
Dec 3, 2024·EP2352431 · METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING X-RAY FOCAL SPOT CHARACTERISTICS FOR TOMOSYNTHESIS AND MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGING
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Patent infringed)ActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Hologic, Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Thure Schubert-Vossius & Partner
- Christian Leopold Zapp-Vossius & Partner
- Arnold Asmussen-Vossius & Partner
- Christoph Eisenmann-Vossius & Partner
Respondents- Siemens Healthineers AGOperating co.
- Siemens Healthcare GmbHOperating co.
- Siemens Healthineers Nederland B.V.Operating co.
- Siemens Healthcare SASOperating co.
Representatives- Matthias Meyer-Bird & Bird LLP
- Daniel Misch-Bird & Bird LLP
- Felix Harbsmeier-Bird & Bird LLP
- Cameron Walker-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Mar 9, 2026
- Last decision
- Jun 10, 2026
- EPO Opposition
- Siemens Healthcare GmbHAdmissible2019-05-14
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Ingo Rinken | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Petri Rinkinen | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Steven Kitchen | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Hologic, Inc. (6 cases)·Siemens Healthineers AG (6 cases)
This dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CoA 94/2026·UPC CoA 93/2026·UPC CFI 259/2025·UPC APP 16529/2025·UPC APP 33733/2025
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
- 2026-06-10Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a final decision concerning EP 2 352 431 B1, finding in favour of Hologic, Inc. against Siemens Healthineers AG and related entities. The decision addressed issues including infringement, recall, removal from channels of commerce, joint and several liability, and publication of the decision under Art. 80 UPCA.
Show the legal issues (12)
- Spatially and physically defined feature
- Inferior embodiment
- Art. 28 UPCA - private prior use right
- Positive right of use
- Art. 64 UPCA - recall and removal from channels of commerce
- Depriving of infringing property
- Software-based modification
- Proportionality - interests of third parties (patients)
- Joint and several liability
- Art. 68 UPCA
- Art. 80 UPCA - publication of decision
- Legitimate interest in publication of decision
- 2026-03-09Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division (Panel 2) rejected Hologic's R. 36 RoP request to submit brief further comments (approx. 5 pages) on Siemens's 3 March 2026 submissions concerning the application to amend the patent, holding the reasons given were too vague (no new facts specified) to justify further pleadings, and finding the claimant's right to be heard was not unduly restricted since it could still oppose the submissions and respond at the oral hearing.
Show the legal issues (3)
- R. 36 RoP application for permission to file further written pleadings
- balancing a party's reasons for further pleadings against the risk of delay to proceedings
- claimant's right to be heard
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Communication | 2026-10-20 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-10-20 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-10-20 | Not public |
| Application document Defendant | 2026-10-20 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-10-19 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-10-18 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-10-18 | Not public |
| Fee | 2026-10-18 | Not public |
| Exhibit Claimant | 2026-10-18 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2026-10-18 | Not public |