UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 758/2024

Dec 3, 2024·EP2352431 · METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING X-RAY FOCAL SPOT CHARACTERISTICS FOR TOMOSYNTHESIS AND MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGING

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent infringed)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Mar 9, 2026
Last decision
Jun 10, 2026
EPO Opposition
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked
Judge Berenice ThomLockedLocked
Judge Ingo RinkenLockedLocked
Judge Petri RinkinenLockedLocked
Judge Steven KitchenLockedLocked

At the UPC: Hologic, Inc. (6 cases)·Siemens Healthineers AG (6 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-06-10
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a final decision concerning EP 2 352 431 B1, finding in favour of Hologic, Inc. against Siemens Healthineers AG and related entities. The decision addressed issues including infringement, recall, removal from channels of commerce, joint and several liability, and publication of the decision under Art. 80 UPCA.

    Show the legal issues (12)
    • Spatially and physically defined feature
    • Inferior embodiment
    • Art. 28 UPCA - private prior use right
    • Positive right of use
    • Art. 64 UPCA - recall and removal from channels of commerce
    • Depriving of infringing property
    • Software-based modification
    • Proportionality - interests of third parties (patients)
    • Joint and several liability
    • Art. 68 UPCA
    • Art. 80 UPCA - publication of decision
    • Legitimate interest in publication of decision
  • 2026-03-09
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division (Panel 2) rejected Hologic's R. 36 RoP request to submit brief further comments (approx. 5 pages) on Siemens's 3 March 2026 submissions concerning the application to amend the patent, holding the reasons given were too vague (no new facts specified) to justify further pleadings, and finding the claimant's right to be heard was not unduly restricted since it could still oppose the submissions and respond at the oral hearing.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • R. 36 RoP application for permission to file further written pleadings
    • balancing a party's reasons for further pleadings against the risk of delay to proceedings
    • claimant's right to be heard
Document titleDatePublic
Communication2026-10-20Not public
Receipt2026-10-20Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-20Not public
Application document Defendant2026-10-20Not public
Communication2026-10-19Not public
Receipt2026-10-18Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-18Not public
Fee2026-10-18Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-10-18Not public
Application document Claimant2026-10-18Not public