UPC CFI 766/2025

Aug 19, 2025·EP3476616 +1 more: PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PRINTING METHOD

Case details: Status
Written Phase
Action
Generic
Category
Main Infringement Action
Parties: Claimants
Kodak Holding GmbH
Kodak GmbH
Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH
Reps: Elena Hennecke
Respondents
Fujifilm Corporation
Reps: Christof Augenstein
Division: Mannheim LD
Judges: Peter Tochtermann
Dirk Böttcher
Peter Agergaard
Erwin Wismeth
Technology: Industrial Manufacturing · Printing Technology
Language: English
First decided: Dec 12, 2025

Decisions

2025-12-12
Infringement Action
The Milan Local Division ordered alternative service on Shenzhen Asmax Infinite Technology Co. under the Hague Service Convention after two failed service attempts (rejected by Chinese authorities due to incorrect reference to Hong Kong), applying Art. 15(2) of the Convention.
Legal issues:Service outside contracting member states (Hague Convention Art. 15(2))Service on Chinese defendant — rejection by central authority

Documents

Document title	Date	Public
order stay proceedings	2025-08-19	Public
Panel-Appointment	2025-08-19	Not public
Receipt	2025-08-19	Not public
Receipt	2025-08-19	Not public
Application	2025-08-18	Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging	2025-08-18	Not public
Application for UK costs	2025-08-18	Not public
Application for UK costs	2025-08-18	Not public
Set of Exhibits FBD-UK 1 - confidential	2025-08-18	Not public
Set of Exhibits FBD-UK 1 - confidential	2025-08-18	Not public