UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1902/2025

Case details
Status
Action
Infringement
Category
Main Infringement Action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Milan LD
Judges
Language
First decided
Jul 10, 2026
Last decision
Jul 29, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-07-29
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Milan Local Division panel dismissed Cardo's application under R. 9, 333 and 334(a) RoP for review and shortening of deadlines, upholding the judge-rapporteur's order that set a notional common start date of 10 June 2026 for all defendants' statements of defence. The Panel held the order was a balanced compromise that extended time for Ziwu while shortening it by an equivalent period for Resosport, and noted the Court cannot compel a representative to accept service under R. 271.1(c) RoP.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • review of a judge-rapporteur order under R. 333 RoP
    • alignment of service dates and the R. 23 RoP period for the statement of defence
    • shortening of time limits under R. 9.3 and R. 334(a) RoP
    • no power to compel a representative to accept service under R. 271.1(c) RoP
  • 2026-07-10
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Milan Local Division issued a procedural order under R. 9 RoP aligning the deadlines for all defendants to file their statements of defence and counterclaims for revocation. The judge rapporteur set 10 June 2026 as a notional common starting date for all defendants (subject to Resosport's immediate acceptance of service), resulting in a common deadline of 10 September 2026 for filing defences.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Alignment of deadlines under R. 9.3 and R. 334(a) RoP
    • Service of statement of claim on a foreign defendant (Resosport in Hong Kong) under R. 271.1(c) RoP
    • Extension and alignment of R. 23 RoP deadline for filing statement of defence
    • Principles of efficiency, equity, fairness and proportionality in case management
Documents
  • 1d69d1fe-6747-4248-a463-75f27f217eb6.pdf2026-07-10EN
  • d0ef728d-38a4-4e68-bd84-77dbaedb6469.pdf2026-07-29EN
Other cases involving the same parties
  • 2026-07-03UPC CoA 111/2026Cardo Systems, Ltd. v Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-10-31UPC CFI 1382/2025Cardo Systems, Ltd. v Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 2024-12-06UPC CFI 766/2024Cardo Systems, Ltd. v Shenzhen Asmax Infinite Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 2024-11-04UPC CFI 643/2024Cardo Systems, Ltd. v Shenzhen Asmax Infinite Technology Co., Ltd.

More cases: Milan LD·2025