UPC CFI 86/2025
Feb 12, 2025·EP2465265 · METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED INTRA CHROMA ENCODING AND DECODING
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Respondents
- The Walt Disney CompanyOperating co.
- The Walt Disney Company (Benelux) B.V.Operating co.
- Disney InteractiveOperating co.
- Disney Electronic Content, Inc.Operating co.
- Disney Platform Distribution, Inc.Operating co.
- The Walt Disney Company LimitedOperating co.
- Disney Enterprises, Inc.Operating co.
- Disney Streaming Services LLCOperating co.
- Disney Media & Entertainment Distribution LLCOperating co.
- Disney Entertainment & Sports LLCOperating co.
- BAMTech LLCOperating co.
Representatives- Dietrich Burkhard Kamlah-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Aug 18, 2026
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Sender | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Daniel Severinsson | — | Locked |
| Judge Dennis Kretschmann | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: InterDigital Group (34 cases)·Disney Group (26 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CFI 3044/2026·UPC CoA 133/2026·UPC CoA 134/2026·UPC CFI 2575/2026·UPC CFI 445/2025 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2025
- 2026-08-18InfringementPublic
Summary: Mannheim Local Division decision of the judge-rapporteur (18 Aug 2026) in the enforcement proceedings of InterDigital v Disney (EP 2 465 265): the claimant's withdrawal of its 23 July 2026 request for penalty payments is permitted by analogy to R. 265 RoP (R. 354.4 RoP), the enforcement proceedings are declared closed, and the claimant bears the costs of the enforcement proceedings. The infringement action itself is not decided here.
Show the legal issues (3)
- R. 354.4 RoP penalty payments in enforcement proceedings
- R. 265 RoP applied by analogy to withdrawal of a penalty request
- costs of enforcement proceedings borne by the withdrawing claimant
- 2025-05-02
Summary: Order from the President of the Court of First Instance dated 2 May 2025, under R. 323 RoP, changing the language of proceedings in Mannheim Local Division case UPC_CFI_86/2025 to the language of the patent (as applied for by The Walt Disney Company entities as defendants). The order sets out principles on language change: the possibility of changing to the patent language does not conflict with the claimant's initial choice; the defendant's position is decisive when the balancing of interests is equal; and since the claimant has flexibility in choosing where to file, the language of the patent is generally not unfair to the claimant.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Change of language of proceedings under Art. 49(5) UPCA and R. 323 RoP
- Balancing parties' interests in language choice
- Defendant's position as decisive factor when interests are equal
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Publication of order | 2026-09-03 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-18 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-18 | Public |
| Communication | 2026-08-06 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-08-06 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-08-06 | Not public |
| Document Claimant | 2026-08-06 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-08-06 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-08-06 | Not public |
| Document Defendant | 2026-08-06 | Not public |