UPC CFI 88/2024
Feb 29, 2024·EP2196231 · System for ambulatory drug infusion comprising a filling apparatus for flexible containers
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Settled)ActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Roche Diabetes Care GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Christof Augenstein-Kather Augenstein
- Sophie Prudent-Kather Augenstein
- Katharina Brandt-Kather Augenstein
- Knaps-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Operating co.
- Tandem Diabetes Care Europe B.V.Operating co.
- VitalAire GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Christian Dekoninck-Taylor Wessing
- Christine Kanz-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Charlotte Garnitsch-Taylor Wessing
- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Iris van der Heijdt-Taylor Wessing
- Pauline Springorum-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Technology
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- English
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Sabine Klepsch | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Schilling | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Tatyana Zhilova | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Giorgio Checcacci | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Roche Group (29 cases)·Tandem Diabetes Care Group (18 cases)
This dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 120/2025·UPC CFI 11/2025·UPC CFI 454/2023·UPC CFI 455/2023·UPC APP 3514/2024 and 4 more
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Hamburg LD·2024
- 2024-09-09
Summary: Preliminary procedural order from Hamburg Local Division dated 9 September 2024 in infringement proceedings brought by Roche Diabetes Care GmbH and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG against Tandem Diabetes Care entities and VitalAire GmbH regarding EP 2 196 231. The order deals with Tandem's request to stay the proceedings. The court balanced the right to a fair trial (Art. 6 ECHR, Art. 47 EU Charter) with the principle that proceedings should normally conclude within one year (RoP Preamble point 7). No stay was granted; the case management timetable was maintained.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Stay of proceedings
- Case management and procedural timetable
- Right to fair trial under Art. 6 ECHR and Art. 47 EU Charter
- One-year principle under RoP Preamble
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case Closure Formal Check | 2025-07-17 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-07-08 | Not public |
| cost reimbursement | 2025-07-08 | Public |
| Comments pursuant to RoP264 | 2025-06-25 | Not public |
| Comments pursuant to RoP264 | 2025-06-25 | Not public |
| 250625_S11979-24-01_Comments_Reimbursement | 2025-06-25 | Not public |
| cost reimbursement pre | 2025-06-20 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-06-19 | Not public |
| 2026-06-18_Draft_request_for_reimbursement_of_court_fees_Roche_-_EP_231_-_LD_HH_signed | 2025-06-18 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-06-18 | Not public |