UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 941/2025

Sep 26, 2025·EP4201327 Unitary patent · FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
File-access requests (R. 262.1(b))
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Milan CD
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Oct 16, 2025
EPO Opposition
  • EOFlow Co., Ltd.Withdrawn2025-03-18
  • KELLER SCHNEIDER PATENTANWALTS GMBHAdmissible2025-03-19
  • Inspicos P/SWithdrawn2025-03-19
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Milan CDLocked
Judge Andrea PostiglioneLocked

At the UPC: Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP (0 cases)·EOFLOW Co., Ltd. (19 cases)

This dispute contains 1 other proceedings

UPC CoA 886/2025

14 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 1230/2026·UPC CoA 34/2026·UPC CoA 930/2025·UPC CFI 773/2025·UPC CoA 194/2025 and 9 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Milan CD·2025

Decisions
  • 2025-10-16
    Application RoP262.1 (b)Public

    Summary: The Central Division Milan, acting under R. 262.1(b) RoP, issued a final order on a third party's (Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP) application for access to redacted documents from the closed Insulet v. EOFLOW proceedings, balancing transparency principles with confidentiality.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • R. 262.1(b) RoP access to documents
    • Third-party access to court files
    • Transparency vs. confidentiality in closed proceedings
Document titleDatePublic
Publication2025-10-17Not public
Case closed2025-10-17Not public
Order2025-10-16Not public
Order2025-10-16Public
Cover sheet2025-10-09Not public
Further pleadings2025-10-09Not public
Further pleadings2025-10-09Not public
Further pleadings2025-10-09Not public
Receipt2025-10-09Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-08Not public