UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 998/2025

Oct 1, 2025·EP3777595 +1 more: INTEGRATED CLOSURE DEVICE COMPONENTS AND METHODS

Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main Infringement Action
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Benjamin Grzikmek (CASALONGA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH); Jörn Peters (CASALONGA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH); Julien Thon (CASALONGA SAS); Floriane Codevelle (CASALONGA SAS)
Respondents
Reps: Richard Schlötter (Heumann Intellectual Property Law); Felix Daul (HGF Munich); Francois Herpe (Cornet Vincent Ségurel); Martin Köhler (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Mirko Weinert (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Joscha Torweihe (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Simon Heilmann (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Andreas Pfund (Dreiss Patentanwälte); Johannes Maurer (Dreiss Patentanwälte)
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
Consumer Goods · Footwear Closures · Packaging & Conveying
Language
English
First decided
Jun 1, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-06-01
    Infringement Action

    The Judge-Rapporteur dismissed Defendant 2 (Shinkyung Inc.)'s application for security for costs under R. 158 RoP. The Court found that SHINKYUNG's arguments — based primarily on the financial difficulties of BOA's holding company CODI — were insufficient, since only BOA's own financial situation is relevant, and BOA was found to have sufficient means to cover any future costs order.

    Legal issues:Security for costs under R. 158 RoP / Art. 69(4) UPCAWhether financial situation of holding company (CODI) is relevant to assessing claimant's meansThreshold for ordering security: sufficient means to meet a future costs order
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.issueOrder.order2026-06-01Not public
Order2026-06-01Public
Receipt2026-05-04Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-05-04Not public
Statement of reply2026-05-04Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-03-25Not public
Order2026-03-25Public
Receipt2026-03-19Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-19Not public
Submission Claimant2026-03-19Not public
Receipt2026-03-18Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-18Not public
Submission Defendant2026-03-18Not public
Receipt2026-03-18Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-18Not public
Submission Defendant2026-03-18Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-03-09Not public
Order2026-03-09Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-03-06Not public
Order2026-03-06Not public
Receipt2026-02-27Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Counterclaim for revocation2026-02-27Not public
Statement of defence2026-02-27Not public
Receipt2026-02-27Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-27Not public
Document Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Counterclaim for revocation2026-02-27Not public
Statement of defence2026-02-27Not public
Statement of defence2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-02-27Not public
Receipt2026-02-25Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-25Not public
Document Defendant2026-02-25Not public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-01-19Not public
Receipt2026-01-16Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-16Not public
Document2026-01-16Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-01-15Not public
Order2026-01-15Not public
Receipt2026-01-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-05Not public
Document2026-01-05Not public
Receipt2025-12-30Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-30Not public
Other document Defendant2025-12-30Not public
action.communication.general2025-12-29Not public
Receipt2025-12-19Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Other document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
action.communication.general2025-12-11Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-11Not public
Other document Defendant2025-12-11Not public
Receipt2025-12-11Not public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2025-11-06Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2025-11-06Not public
Other Documents2025-10-08Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-01Not public
Fee2025-10-01Not public
Statement of claim2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Exhibit2025-10-01Not public
Receipt2025-10-01Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Only BOA's own financial situation (not that of its holding company CODI) is relevant when assessing sufficient means under Art. 69(4) UPCA

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 69(4) UPCA; UPC CoA Order UPC_CFI_548/2024 (Aarke v. Sodastream) §21
  • BOA's latest financial analysis (17 March 2026, Q4 2025) shows CODI earned USD 64.3 million, demonstrating BOA has sufficient means

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 69(4) UPCA; R. 158 RoP
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • CODI's stock price decline of 62% in 2025 and negative growth estimates for 2026 demonstrate that BOA lacks sufficient means to meet a future costs order

    RespondentLegal basis: R. 158 RoP; Art. 69(4) UPCA