UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Jan 4, 2024

UPC_CoA_1/2024

METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING SPATIALLY LOCATED INFORMATION TO A MOBILE TERMINAL

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • VusionGroup SA (formerly SES-imagotag SA)
Reps: Jochen Herr (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP); Alexandre Hoffmann (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP); Daniel Seitz (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP)

Respondents

  • Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd
  • Hanshow Germany GmbH
  • Hanshow France SAS
  • Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Reps: Roland Küppers (Taylor Wessing PartGmbB); Alexander Rubusch (Taylor Wessing PartGmbB)
Judges
  • Klaus Grabinski
  • Peter Blok
  • Eric Augarde
  • Klaus Loibner
Patents
  • EP3883277
  • EP 3 883 277
CPC codes: H04W4/80, H04L67/306, G06Q30/06, H04W4/02, G06Q30/0267, H04W4/024, H04W4/185, G06F16/9537, H04W4/33, G09G2380/04, H04W4/35, H04W4/029

Sector: Computing & AI

Outcome
PI denied
Filed: Jan 4, 2024
First decided:
Language: German

Order of the Court of Appeal (Panel 1, with technical judges) dismissing the appeal by VusionGroup SA (formerly SES-imagotag SA) against the Munich Local Division's rejection of its application for provisional measures against Hanshow Technology and related entities regarding electronic shelf labels. The Court of Appeal, applying a balance-of-probabilities standard, found that none of Hanshow's contested products fell within the scope of protection of claim 1 of EP 3 883 277, because the antenna was not positioned more to the front of the label than the printed circuit board as required by the claim. The court held that claim features must always be interpreted in light of the claim as a whole. The appeal was rejected and the appellant was ordered to bear the costs of appeal.

Open on UPC Registry