UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 10/2026

·EP2152073: HERBICIDE COMPOSITIONS

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Document Access (RoP262)
Parties
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Agriculture
Language
First decided
Feb 24, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-02-24
    Application RoP262.1 (b)

    The Court of Appeal ruled on public access to the register under R. 262.1(b) RoP in the Sumi Agro v Syngenta proceedings. The Court established that reasoned requests for written pleadings and evidence lodged at the Court of First Instance must be made to the relevant CFI Division, while requests for documents lodged at the Court of Appeal must be made to the CoA. The Court clarified the allocation of responsibilities between Registrar and Deputy-Registrar and held that a request for access must be specified and cannot require the Court to search and select documents based on relevance criteria set by the requesting party. The decision resolved a jurisdictional question about which court body handles public access requests.

    Legal issues:Public access to the register under R. 262.1(b) RoPAllocation of responsibilities between Registrar and Deputy-RegistrarArt. 23 and Art. 25 UPCS distinction between central register and sub-registriesSpecificity requirements for access requests
Documents
  • Decision%20access%20Gowling%20Sumi%20Syngenta%2010-2026.pdf2026-02-24EN