- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieAnträge auf Akteneinsicht (R. 262.1(b))
- Parteien
- Beklagte
- Sumi Agro LimitedUnternehmen
- Sumi Agro Europe LimitedUnternehmen
- Syngenta LimitedUnternehmen
Vertreter- Jörn Peters-Casalonga
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- —
- Technologie
- ChemistryBasic materials chemistry
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 24. Feb. 2026
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
Vor dem UPC: Gowling WLG (0 Verfahren)·Sumi Agro Limited (8 Verfahren)
6 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
UPC CFI 326/2025·UPC CFI 322/2025·UPC CoA 286/2025·UPC CFI 566/2024·UPC CoA 523/2024 und 1 weitere
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Court of Appeal·2026
- 2026-02-24Application RoP262.1 (b)Öffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal ruled on public access to the register under R. 262.1(b) RoP in the Sumi Agro v Syngenta proceedings. The Court established that reasoned requests for written pleadings and evidence lodged at the Court of First Instance must be made to the relevant CFI Division, while requests for documents lodged at the Court of Appeal must be made to the CoA. The Court clarified the allocation of responsibilities between Registrar and Deputy-Registrar and held that a request for access must be specified and cannot require the Court to search and select documents based on relevance criteria set by the requesting party. The decision resolved a jurisdictional question about which court body handles public access requests.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- Public access to the register under R. 262.1(b) RoP
- Allocation of responsibilities between Registrar and Deputy-Registrar
- Art. 23 and Art. 25 UPCS distinction between central register and sub-registries
- Specificity requirements for access requests
- Decision%20access%20Gowling%20Sumi%20Syngenta%2010-2026.pdf2026-02-24EN