UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 100/2026

Jun 24, 2026·EP2712236 +2 more: Method and arrangement in a telecommunication system for neighbour cell measurements

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Result in this case
Withdrawndecided together with a related case; the ruling below covers both
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
English
First decided
Jul 2, 2026
Last decision
Jul 16, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-07-16
    WithdrawnAppeal decisionAppeal

    The Court of Appeal permitted the withdrawal of appeals UPC-CoA-100/2026, UPC-CoA-101/2026 and UPC-CoA-102/2026 following a settlement between Shenzhen Transsion (appellants) and Ericsson (respondent), and declared the proceedings closed. Each party is to bear its own costs, and Shenzhen Transsion is to be reimbursed 50% of the appeal fees (EUR 2,000) pursuant to R. 370.9(b) RoP.

    Legal issues:Withdrawal of appeal under R. 265 RoPReimbursement of court fees on withdrawal under R. 370.9(b) RoPConfidentiality measures under R. 262A and R. 262.2 RoP (impugned order)FRAND licensing — 4G LTE and 5G NR technology
  • 2026-07-02
    Appeal decisionAppeal

    On Shenzhen Transsion's appeals against the Hague Local Division's confidentiality-club order of 27 May 2026 in the Ericsson FRAND proceedings, the standing judge held that where the Court of First Instance does not decide a request for leave to appeal within the 15-day period of R. 220.2 RoP, leave is deemed refused and the CFI cannot grant it later, so its grant of 15 June 2026 was ineffective. Observing that the request filed on 10 June 2026 might nonetheless be read as including a request for discretionary review under R. 220.3 RoP, the Court invited the parties to comment on that point within five calendar days.

    Legal issues:leave to appeal deemed refused where the Court of First Instance does not decide within 15 days (R. 220.2 RoP)the CFI cannot grant leave retroactively after the time limit has expireddiscretionary review by the Court of Appeal under R. 220.3 RoPconfidentiality club regime under R. 262A and R. 262.2 RoP in FRAND proceedingsexternal-eyes-only access versus access for in-house representatives
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.publishOrderDecision.order2026-07-16Not public
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-07-16Not public
action.publishOrderDecision.order2026-07-16Not public
action.issueDecision.decision2026-07-16Not public
Final Order2026-07-16Public
Receipt2026-07-10Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-10Not public
Application Respondent2026-07-10Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-07-10Not public
Order2026-07-10Public
Receipt2026-07-09Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-09Not public
Application Appellant2026-07-09Not public
Receipt2026-07-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Submission Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Receipt2026-07-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-07Not public
Submission Respondent2026-07-07Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-07-02Not public
Order2026-07-02Public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-07-02Not public
Receipt2026-06-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-06-30Not public
Other document Appellant2026-06-30Not public
Other document Appellant2026-06-30Not public
Other document Appellant2026-06-30Not public
Formal Deficiency found2026-06-29Not public
Receipt2026-06-24Not public
Cover sheet2026-06-24Not public
Fee2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-06-24Not public
Statement of the Grounds of Appeal2026-06-24Not public
Statement of Appeal2026-06-24Not public