UPC CoA 100/2026

At the UPC: Transsion Group (31 cases)·Ericsson Group (53 cases)

• 2026-07-16
  AppealPublic

  Summary: The Court of Appeal permitted the withdrawal of appeals UPC-CoA-100/2026, UPC-CoA-101/2026 and UPC-CoA-102/2026 following a settlement between Shenzhen Transsion (appellants) and Ericsson (respondent), and declared the proceedings closed. Each party is to bear its own costs, and Shenzhen Transsion is to be reimbursed 50% of the appeal fees (EUR 2,000) pursuant to R. 370.9(b) RoP.

  Show the legal issues (4)

  • Withdrawal of appeal under R. 265 RoP
  • Reimbursement of court fees on withdrawal under R. 370.9(b) RoP
  • Confidentiality measures under R. 262A and R. 262.2 RoP (impugned order)
  • FRAND licensing — 4G LTE and 5G NR technology
• 2026-07-02
  AppealPublic

  Summary: On Shenzhen Transsion's appeals against the Hague Local Division's confidentiality-club order of 27 May 2026 in the Ericsson FRAND proceedings, the standing judge held that where the Court of First Instance does not decide a request for leave to appeal within the 15-day period of R. 220.2 RoP, leave is deemed refused and the CFI cannot grant it later, so its grant of 15 June 2026 was ineffective. Observing that the request filed on 10 June 2026 might nonetheless be read as including a request for discretionary review under R. 220.3 RoP, the Court invited the parties to comment on that point within five calendar days.

  Show the legal issues (5)

  • leave to appeal deemed refused where the Court of First Instance does not decide within 15 days (R. 220.2 RoP)
  • the CFI cannot grant leave retroactively after the time limit has expired
  • discretionary review by the Court of Appeal under R. 220.3 RoP
  • confidentiality club regime under R. 262A and R. 262.2 RoP in FRAND proceedings
  • external-eyes-only access versus access for in-house representatives