UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1568/2025

Nov 13, 2025·EP2712236 SEP +2 more · Method and arrangement in a telecommunication system for neighbour cell measurements

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Withdrawn)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Patents
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication · Telecommunications · Basic communication processes
Language
English
First decided
Jun 15, 2026
Last decision
Aug 26, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
The Hague LDLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Samuel GranataLockedLocked
Judge Christian KellerLockedLocked

At the UPC: Ericsson Group (53 cases)·Transsion Group (31 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-08-26
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Hague Local Division allowed Ericsson's withdrawal, under R. 265 RoP, of three parallel SEP infringement actions against the Transsion group of defendants (UPC_CFI_1568/2025 re EP 2712236, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 re EP 3836631, and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 re EP 3245744) following a settlement with all defendants, and declared the proceedings closed. The Registry was ordered to reimburse the claimant 25% of the court fees paid in each case, reduced from the standard 50% under R.370.9(e) RoP given the claimant's procedural conduct, with no further costs decision needed.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Withdrawal of an infringement action under R. 265.1 RoP following settlement with all defendants
    • Deemed consent to withdrawal from a non-responding defendant
    • Reimbursement of court fees under R. 370.9(b) RoP and reduction under R. 370.9(e) RoP for procedural conduct in multiple parallel SEP actions
    • Applicability of the RoP as amended 1 January 2026 to applications filed in 2026
    • Value of the action for fee-reimbursement purposes
  • 2026-06-15
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The court refused leave to appeal the R.20.2 RoP order of 13 May 2026 (dealing with a preliminary objection that will be addressed in the main proceedings), but granted leave to appeal the Confidentiality Order of 27 May 2026 regarding a phased confidentiality club regime for comparable licence documents.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Leave to appeal under R.220.2 RoP
    • Confidentiality club regime for comparable licence documents
    • Phased confidentiality regime for SEP/FRAND proceedings
    • Preliminary objection to be dealt with in main proceedings (R.20.2 RoP)
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-08-26Not public
Publication of order2026-08-26Not public
Order2026-08-26Not public
Order2026-08-26Public
Receipt2026-08-19Not public
Cover sheet2026-08-19Not public
Document2026-08-19Not public
Communication2026-08-19Not public
Communication2026-08-14Not public
Receipt2026-07-10Not public