UPC CFI 1568/2025
Nov 13, 2025·EP2712236 SEP +2 more · Method and arrangement in a telecommunication system for neighbour cell measurements
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM EricssonOperating co.
Representatives- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- David Mulder-Taylor Wessing
- Sebastien Versaevel-Taylor Wessing
Respondents- Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, LtdOperating co.
- TECNO MOBILE LIMITEDOperating co.
- Itel Mobile LimitedOperating co.
- INFINIX MOBILITY LIMITEDOperating co.
- Tekpoint GmbHOperating co.
- IRD Distribuce, S.R.OOperating co.
- x-kom GmbHOperating co.
- TradeInn Retail Services, S.L.Operating co.
- Egenta s.r.o.Operating co.
- NTT System S.A.Operating co.
Representatives- Aglika Ivanova-IP Consulting Ltd.
- Andreas Kramer-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Alexander Wilson-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Ari Laakkonen-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Division
- The Hague LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication · Telecommunications · Basic communication processes
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Jun 15, 2026
- Last decision
- Aug 26, 2026
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| The Hague LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Margot Kokke | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Samuel Granata | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Christian Keller | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Ericsson Group (53 cases)·Transsion Group (31 cases)
This dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CoA 100/2026·UPC CoA 101/2026·UPC CoA 102/2026·UPC CFI 1791/2025·UPC CFI 1793/2025
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: The Hague LD·2025
- 2026-08-26InfringementPublic
Summary: The Hague Local Division allowed Ericsson's withdrawal, under R. 265 RoP, of three parallel SEP infringement actions against the Transsion group of defendants (UPC_CFI_1568/2025 re EP 2712236, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 re EP 3836631, and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 re EP 3245744) following a settlement with all defendants, and declared the proceedings closed. The Registry was ordered to reimburse the claimant 25% of the court fees paid in each case, reduced from the standard 50% under R.370.9(e) RoP given the claimant's procedural conduct, with no further costs decision needed.
Show the legal issues (5)
- Withdrawal of an infringement action under R. 265.1 RoP following settlement with all defendants
- Deemed consent to withdrawal from a non-responding defendant
- Reimbursement of court fees under R. 370.9(b) RoP and reduction under R. 370.9(e) RoP for procedural conduct in multiple parallel SEP actions
- Applicability of the RoP as amended 1 January 2026 to applications filed in 2026
- Value of the action for fee-reimbursement purposes
- 2026-06-15Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The court refused leave to appeal the R.20.2 RoP order of 13 May 2026 (dealing with a preliminary objection that will be addressed in the main proceedings), but granted leave to appeal the Confidentiality Order of 27 May 2026 regarding a phased confidentiality club regime for comparable licence documents.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Leave to appeal under R.220.2 RoP
- Confidentiality club regime for comparable licence documents
- Phased confidentiality regime for SEP/FRAND proceedings
- Preliminary objection to be dealt with in main proceedings (R.20.2 RoP)
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2026-08-26 | Not public |
| Publication of order | 2026-08-26 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-26 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-26 | Public |
| Receipt | 2026-08-19 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-08-19 | Not public |
| Document | 2026-08-19 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-08-19 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-08-14 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-07-10 | Not public |