UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 12/2025

8. Jan. 2025·EP2145848 +1 more: False twist texturing machine

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Allgemein
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Peter Fitzpatrick (Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Stefania Bergia; Giulio E. Sironi
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Packaging & Conveying
Sprache
Italian
Erste Entscheidung
16. Jan. 2025
Letzte Entscheidung
9. Dez. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-12-09
    SonstigesAppeal RoP220.1

    Italian-language version of the Court of Appeal decision (same case as UPC_CoA_8/2025) on damages and costs in the Bhagat v Oerlikon appeal (EP 2 145 848). The CoA confirmed Bhagat's negligent infringement, rejected Oerlikon's reputational damage claims, and upheld the 80/20 cost split from the first-instance proceedings.

    Rechtsfragen:Damages assessment (Art. 68 UPCA)Knowledge/negligence of infringerMoral/reputational prejudiceCost allocation
    Schadenersatz: Haftung festgestellt, Höhe vorbehalten · Grundlage: lost_profits
  • 2025-01-16
    Application Rop 223

    The Court of Appeal (judge-rapporteur Emmanuel Gougé) rejected Bhagat Textile Engineers' application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) of the Milan Local Division's infringement judgment of 4 November 2024 concerning EP 2 145 848. The Milan LD had found Bhagat liable for infringement, issued an injunction for Italy and Germany, imposed a penalty payment of EUR 12,000, and ordered provisional damages of EUR 15,000. Bhagat failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying suspensive effect, having only vaguely claimed parallel invalidity proceedings and 'considerable doubts' about validity without substantiation.

    Rechtsfragen:Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 223 RoP)Exceptional circumstances threshold for suspensive effectInfringement judgment with injunction and provisional damagesParallel invalidity proceedings as basis for suspensive effect
  • 2025-01-16
    Application Rop 223

    Italian-language version of the Court of Appeal order (judge-rapporteur Emmanuel Gougé) rejecting Bhagat Textile Engineers' application for suspensive effect of the Milan Local Division's infringement judgment of 4 November 2024 (EP 2 145 848). Identical substance to the English version: Bhagat failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying suspensive effect.

    Rechtsfragen:Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 223 RoP)Exceptional circumstances threshold for suspensive effectInfringement judgment with injunction and provisional damagesParallel invalidity proceedings
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-12-09Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-01-16Nicht öffentlich
Order2025-01-16Öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2025-01-14Nicht öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2025-01-09Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2025-01-09Nicht öffentlich
2025.01.08 Application for Suspensive Effect - EN ORIGINAL - SIGNED2025-01-08Nicht öffentlich
2025.01.08 Application for Suspensive Effect - EN ORIGINAL - SIGNED2025-01-08Nicht öffentlich