UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CoA 123/2026

Jul 24, 2026·EP2129425 · EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE

Follow
Case details
Status
Oral Phase
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Aug 17, 2026
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Renaud FulconisLocked
Judge Max TilmannLocked

At the UPC: AorticLab srl (6 cases)·Emboline, Inc. (6 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

This dispute contains 5 other proceedings

UPC CoA 40/2026·UPC CoA 393/2025·UPC CFI 125/2025·UPC CFI 628/2024·UPC APP 8962/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2026

Decisions
  • 2026-08-17
    AppealPublic

    Summary: Court of Appeal rejected AorticLab's requested review of the clarification order, re-established its right to lodge a statement of appeal and grounds of appeal against the first-instance decision, declared the appeal filed on 24 July 2026 admissible, and shortened the period for the statement of response to two months. The appeal itself is not decided by this order.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • review of an order (R. 333 RoP)
    • re-establishment of rights (R. 320 RoP)
    • conditional counterclaim for revocation
    • intra- vs inter-procedural conditions
    • cross-appeal
Documents
Show all 31 documents
Document titleDatePublic
Oral procedure opened2026-09-30Not public
Written procedure closed2026-09-30Not public
Summons to oral hearing2026-09-30Not public
Summons2026-09-30Public
Receipt2026-09-24Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-24Not public
Statement of Response2026-09-24Not public
Order2026-08-28Not public
Order2026-08-28Public
Order2026-08-28Public