UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CoA 183/2024

Apr 22, 2024·EP2792100 · METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER A NETWORK USING A HARDWARE SECURITY ENGINE

Follow
Case details
Status
Case Closed (Claim dismissed)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
May 1, 2024
Last decision
Aug 6, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked

At the UPC: Daedalus Prime LLC (10 cases)·MediaTek Group (20 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

This dispute contains 9 other proceedings

UPC CFI 113/2025·UPC CoA 621/2024·UPC CFI 436/2024·UPC CFI 169/2024·UPC APP 42733/2024 and 4 more

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 288/2024

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2024

Decisions
  • 2024-08-06
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: Order from the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_183/2024) addressing service of a Statement of Claim on defendants based in China and Taiwan. The Court held that a group company in a Contracting Member State cannot automatically be used to serve Chinese or Taiwanese parent companies; Hague Convention procedures must normally be attempted first for China, and diplomatic/consular channels for Taiwan, before alternative methods are permitted.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Service on defendants in China and Taiwan (R. 273, R. 274 RoP)
    • Hague Service Convention
    • Service via group company
    • Alternative methods of service
  • 2024-06-04
    Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal (4 June 2024) rejected Daedalus Prime LLC's application to partially withdraw its appeal as against Xiaomi NL and Xiaomi DE only. The CoA held that those respondents had been served, had responded to the appeal, and had a legitimate interest in having the appeal adjudicated in relation to them, so partial withdrawal would impermissibly deprive them of their right to be heard.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Partial withdrawal of appeal (R. 265 RoP)
    • Right to be heard
    • Respondents' legitimate interest
  • 2024-05-01
    Application RoP 333Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal (Second Panel) dismissed Daedalus Prime LLC's request for panel review of an order refusing extension of time for the Statement of Grounds of Appeal. The panel found no grounds to deviate from the judge-rapporteur's order, holding that the desire to present a thorough analysis or obtain a legal opinion does not justify extension.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Panel review (R. 333 RoP)
    • Extension of time for Statement of Grounds of Appeal (R. 224.2, R. 9.3 RoP)
    • Exceptional circumstances for extension
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-16Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-14Not public
Close workflow2025-02-14Public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-14Not public
Close workflow2025-02-14Public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-12Not public
Close workflow2025-02-12Public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-12Not public
Close workflow2025-02-12Public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-07Not public
Close workflow2025-02-07Public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-08-06Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-08-06Not public
DecisionOutcome2024-08-06Not public
Final order2024-08-06Public
Receipt2024-06-26Not public
Submission 250620242024-06-26Not public
Hearing Reference2024-06-07Not public
Hearing Reference2024-06-07Not public
Updated summons to oral hearing2024-06-05Public
interimProcedureClosure2024-06-05Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-06-04Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-06-04Not public
Order on partial withdrawal of appeal2024-06-04Public
Receipt2024-05-31Not public
Exhibit PS 52024-05-31Not public
Reply to Response to Appeal2024-05-31Not public
Exhibit PS 42024-05-31Not public
Schriftsatz2024-05-30Not public
Schriftsatz2024-05-30Not public
Response re time of oral hearing2024-05-29Not public
Response re time of oral hearing2024-05-29Not public
Procedural order R236 and joint hearing2024-05-29Not public
Procedural order communicating application to partially withdraw appeal2024-05-28Not public
Submission2024-05-27Not public
Receipt2024-05-24Not public
Partial Withdrawal of R. 220.2 Appeal2024-05-24Not public
Consultation about the Statement of response2024-05-24Not public
Case management order2024-05-24Public
Receipt2024-05-22Not public
Receipt2024-05-22Not public
Application for intervention2024-05-21Not public
Exhibit BP012024-05-21Not public
Statement of Response2024-05-21Not public
summons2024-05-17Not public
Summons to oral hearing2024-05-17Public
interimConferenceDecisionAppeal2024-05-13Not public
Receipt2024-05-06Not public
Statement of grounds of appeal2024-05-03Not public
Exhibit PS 22024-05-03Not public
Amended Statement of Appeal of April 27, 20242024-05-03Not public
Exhibit PS 12024-05-03Not public
Technical Explantion2024-05-03Not public
Exhibit PS 32024-05-03Not public
Statement of Appeal of April 22, 20242024-05-03Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-05-01Not public
Panel order concerning time extension2024-05-01Public
Receipt2024-04-30Not public
Application for review R. 333 RoP2024-04-29Not public
Order concerning time extension2024-04-29Public
Panel-Appointment2024-04-29Not public
Receipt2024-04-29Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-04-29Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-04-29Not public
Amended appeal R. 220.22024-04-27Not public
impugned decision CFI 169-20242024-04-27Not public
Appeal RoP220.2 and request for extension of time period2024-04-27Not public
Amended appeal R. 220.2 redline2024-04-27Not public
Formal response to the request for amendments2024-04-27Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2024-04-26Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-04-22Not public
Appeal RoP220.2 and request for extension of time period2024-04-22Not public
impugned decision CFI 169-20242024-04-22Not public