- Case details
- Status—ActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- ChemistryEnvironmental technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 15, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
At the UPC: VALINEA ENERGIE SASU (10 cases)·TIRU SAS (18 cases)
This dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 127/2026·UPC CoA 81/2026·UPC CFI 1323/2026·UPC CFI 509/2025·UPC CFI 130/2025 and 4 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 79/2026·UPC CoA 80/2026·UPC CFI 1325/2026·UPC CFI 528/2025·UPC CFI 417/2025 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2025
- 2025-07-15Appeal RoP220.1Public
Summary: Court of Appeal order concerning VALINEA's application for review of an order to preserve evidence granted to TIRU at first instance. The CoA upheld the first-instance order, confirming that: the time taken to file the application for evidence preservation did not undermine urgency; the risk of unavailability of evidence was assessed by probability not certainty; and the applicant's duty of candour was not violated. The appeal by VALINEA was dismissed.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Review of evidence preservation order (R.192-199 RoP)
- Urgency in evidence preservation versus provisional measures
- Risk of evidence unavailability assessed by probability
- Applicant's duty of candour (R.192.3 RoP)
- ORDER_VALINEA%20v%20TIRU_2025-07-15_EN_version.pdf2025-07-15EN
- ORDER_VALINEA%20v%20TIRU_2025-07-15_FR_Signed_15.07.2025.pdf2025-07-15FR