Overview · Filed: Jan 23, 2024
UPC_CoA_22/2024
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
No citations extracted from this case's decisions.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
| Cited in | Date | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APL_40470/2024 Court of Appeal | Dec 20, 2024 | stay of proceedings | Distinguished | Unlike decisions in parallel revocation proceedings and opposition proceedings, which are not irreconcilable (Court of Appeal 28 May 20204, APL_3507/2024, UPC_CoA_22/2024, Carrier/BITZER, paragraph 25) |
| APL_50205/2024 Court of Appeal | Nov 21, 2024 | stay of proceedings | Distinguished | Unlike decisions in parallel revocation proceedings and opposition proceedings, which are not irreconcilable (Court of Appeal 28 May 20204, APL_3507/2024, UPC_CoA_22/2024, Carrier/BITZER, paragraph 25) |
| UPC_CoA_937/2025 Court of Appeal | Feb 17, 2026 | jurisdiction | Binding | the interests of harmonisation in general do not require a stay by the UPC where it can be expected that the UPC will issue its decision first (UPC_CoA_22/2024, 28 May 2024, Carrier v BITZER, paragraph 25) |