UPC CoA 233/2025
Mar 17, 2025·EP4238202 · MOBILE HYBRID GENERATOR SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ELECTRICAL POWER
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Respondents
- HGSystem ApSOperating co.
- HGSystem Holding ApSOperating co.
- Infotech Concept ApSOperating co.
- Infotech Holding ApSOther / unknown
- Name withheld (GDPR)
Representatives- Allan Christensen
- Kenneth Kvistgaard-Aaholm-Gorrissen Federspiel
- Not named-COPA Copenhagen Patents
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy
- Language
- Danish
- First decided
- May 8, 2025
- Last decision
- Jun 4, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- HGSystem ApSAdmissible2025-05-13
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Rian Kalden | Locked |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
| Judge Patricia Rombach | Locked |
At the UPC: Hybridgenerator ApS (12 cases)·HGSystem ApS (12 cases)
This dispute contains 11 other proceedings
UPC CoA 169/2026·UPC CoA 170/2026·UPC CoA 171/2026·UPC CoA 172/2026·UPC CoA 124/2026 and 6 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2025
- 2025-06-04Appeal RoP220.2Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal ruled that when adjudicating on a request for imposition of periodic penalty payments pursuant to Rule 354.4 RoP, the composition of the court must be a panel and not a single judge. The impugned order issued by a single judge was set aside in that part.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Composition of court for periodic penalty payments
- Rule 354.4 RoP
- Single judge vs. panel composition
- 2025-05-08
Summary: Court of Appeal order changing the language of appeal proceedings from Danish to English with the agreement of both parties under Art. 49(4) UPCA and R. 322 RoP. The underlying appeal concerned the Copenhagen Local Division's refusal to order respondents to pay periodic penalty payments for non-compliance with a prior injunction. The Court of Appeal agreed the language change was appropriate given the limited scope of the appeal and both parties understanding English, and addressed translation costs of existing pleadings.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Change of language of proceedings with agreement (Art. 49(4) UPCA, R. 322 RoP)
- Periodic penalty payments for non-compliance with injunction
- Translation costs
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-06-12 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| DecisionOutcome | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| FinalOrder | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| Final order | 2025-06-04 | Public |
| Final order | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| Hearing reference | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| Hearing reference | 2025-06-04 | Not public |
| Interim-Procedure-Closure | 2025-06-04 | Not public |