UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Jul 5, 2024

UPC_CoA_290/2024

METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SPEED AND THE POSITIONING OF A TOOL CHANGING TRUCK, AND WORK STATION FOR A MACHINE EQUIPPED WITH INTERCHANGEABLE TOOLS

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • STÄUBLI TEC-SYSTEMS GMBH
Reps: Stefan Golkowsky (Pfennig, Meinig und Partner mbB); Johannes Bukow (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan)

Respondents

  • [Anonymised former patent holders]
Reps: Thomas Schart (RGTH Patentanwälte PartGmbB); Christoph Bartels (RGTH Patentanwälte PartGmbB); Daniel Hoppe (Preu Bohlig & Partner)
Judges
  • Rian Kalden
  • Patricia Rombach
  • Ingeborg Simonsson
  • Beate Schenk
  • Kerstin Roselinger
Patents
  • EP3170639
CPC codes: B29C45/1756, B29C31/006
Outcome
Costs only
Filed: Jul 5, 2024
First decided:
Language:

The Court of Appeal dismissed Stäubli's appeal against the Paris Central Division's cost order in a revocation action in which the patent holders surrendered their patent after proceedings commenced. The Court upheld an equitable exception to the general rule (Art. 69(1) UPCA) that the unsuccessful party bears costs: where a claimant files a revocation action without the patent holder giving cause, and the patent holder surrenders the patent immediately at the outset and concurrently files a revocation request with the EPO under Art. 105a EPC, the claimant may bear the costs. The Court applied equity because the patent holders had announced timely surrender and completed formalities only 8 days late without causing extra costs.

Open on UPC Registry