UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 37/2026

Feb 27, 2026·EP4295806 Unitary patent · METHOD TO MODIFY ALIGNER BY MODIFYING TOOTH POSITION

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Claim dismissed)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Mar 10, 2026
EPO Opposition
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Ulrike VoßLocked

At the UPC: Angelalign Group (8 cases)·Align Technology, Inc. (8 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-03-10
    Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal (standing judge) dismissed Angelalign's request for discretionary review under R.220.3 RoP against a procedural order of the Düsseldorf Local Division extending a deadline in provisional measures proceedings. The CoA found that no manifest error was demonstrated: the Local Division did not exceed its discretionary powers, correctly applied R.9.3(a) RoP, and properly exercised its discretion in allowing a late reply based on human error. The requirements for discretionary review were not met.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP)
    • Manifest error standard
    • Extension of time limits (R.9.3(a) RoP)
    • Hierarchy of R.320 RoP and R.9.3(a) RoP for missed deadlines
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Communication2026-03-10Not public
Decision2026-03-10Not public
Final Order2026-03-10Public
Case closed2026-03-10Not public
Publication2026-03-03Not public
Receipt2026-02-27Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-27Not public
Fee2026-02-27Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2026-02-27Not public