UPClytics
DeutschEnglish
AnmeldenRegistrieren
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 37/2026

27. Feb. 2026·EP4295806: METHOD TO MODIFY ALIGNER BY MODIFYING TOOTH POSITION

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: John Brunner (Carpmaels & Ransford); Agathe Michel-De Cazotte (Carpmaels & Ransford)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Arno Riße (Arnold Ruess); Tim Smentkowski (Arnold Ruess); Julius Winkler (Arnold Ruess)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
10. März 2026
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-03-10
    AbgewiesenBerufungsentscheidungRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    Court of Appeal (standing judge) dismissed Angelalign's request for discretionary review under R.220.3 RoP against a procedural order of the Düsseldorf Local Division extending a deadline in provisional measures proceedings. The CoA found that no manifest error was demonstrated: the Local Division did not exceed its discretionary powers, correctly applied R.9.3(a) RoP, and properly exercised its discretion in allowing a late reply based on human error. The requirements for discretionary review were not met.

    Rechtsfragen:Discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP)Manifest error standardExtension of time limits (R.9.3(a) RoP)Hierarchy of R.320 RoP and R.9.3(a) RoP for missed deadlines
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
action.communication.general2026-03-10Nicht öffentlich
action.issueDecision.decision2026-03-10Nicht öffentlich
Final Order2026-03-10Öffentlich
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-03-10Nicht öffentlich
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-03-03Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2026-02-27Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-02-27Nicht öffentlich
Fee2026-02-27Nicht öffentlich
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2026-02-27Nicht öffentlich