UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 434/2025

May 15, 2025·EP2028981 · JUICE EXTRACTOR

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Other fields
    Consumer products
Language
English
First decided
Jun 6, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Klaus GrabinskiLocked
Judge Emmanuel GougéLocked
Judge Peter BlokLocked

At the UPC: NUC Electronics Group (29 cases)·Hurom Co., Ltd. (29 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-06-06
    Application RoP 223Public

    Summary: Procedural order from the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_434/2025) denying NUC Electronics' application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's infringement judgment (UPC_CFI_162/2024) concerning EP 2 028 981 in favour of Hurom. NUC was required to disclose information about its customers and distribution channels; it argued for suspension pending appeal. The Court held that information disclosure orders should only be suspended in exceptional circumstances, and NUC had not shown its appeal would become devoid of purpose without suspensive effect.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 223 RoP, Art. 74 UPCA)
    • Information disclosure orders (Art. 67 UPCA)
    • Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC
    • Balance of interests
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-03-27Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-06-06Not public
Order2025-06-06Public
Exhibit A-SE 12025-05-30Not public
Reply_Application_For_Suspensive_Effect_UPC_CoA_434_20252025-05-30Not public
Procedural Order2025-05-22Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-05-16Not public
Receipt2025-05-16Not public
2025-05-15 Application Suspensive Effect PBP to the UPC Court of Appeal (NUC Korea)_R2232025-05-16Not public