UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 434/2025

15. Mai 2025·EP2028981: JUICE EXTRACTOR

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Allgemein
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Martin Momtschilow
Beklagte
Vertreter: Klaus Haft
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Furniture & Household
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
6. Juni 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-06-06
    Application Rop 223

    Procedural order from the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_434/2025) denying NUC Electronics' application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's infringement judgment (UPC_CFI_162/2024) concerning EP 2 028 981 in favour of Hurom. NUC was required to disclose information about its customers and distribution channels; it argued for suspension pending appeal. The Court held that information disclosure orders should only be suspended in exceptional circumstances, and NUC had not shown its appeal would become devoid of purpose without suspensive effect.

    Rechtsfragen:Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 223 RoP, Art. 74 UPCA)Information disclosure orders (Art. 67 UPCA)Enforcement Directive 2004/48/ECBalance of interests
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-03-27Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-06-06Nicht öffentlich
Order2025-06-06Öffentlich
Exhibit A-SE 12025-05-30Nicht öffentlich
Reply_Application_For_Suspensive_Effect_UPC_CoA_434_20252025-05-30Nicht öffentlich
Procedural Order2025-05-22Nicht öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2025-05-16Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2025-05-16Nicht öffentlich
2025-05-15 Application Suspensive Effect PBP to the UPC Court of Appeal (NUC Korea)_R2232025-05-16Nicht öffentlich