UPC CoA 464/2024
Aug 2, 2024·EP3646825 · A SYSTEM COMPRISING A PROSTHETIC VALVE AND A DELIVERY CATHETER
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Patent upheld as granted)ActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Meril Italy srlOperating co.
Representatives- Emmanuel Larere-Cabinet Gide Loyrette Nouel AARPI
- Andreas von Falck-Hogan Lovells International LLP
- Roman Würtenberger-Hogan Lovells International LLP
- Beatrice Wilden-Hogan Lovells International LLP
Respondents- Edwards Lifesciences CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Boris Kreye-Bird & Bird LLP
- Anika Boche-Bird & Bird LLP
- Elsa Tzschoppe-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Sep 6, 2024
- Last decision
- Nov 25, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
| Judge Peter Blok | Locked |
| Judge Emmanuel Gougé | Locked |
| Judge Elisabetta Papa | Locked |
| Judge Max Tilmann | Locked |
At the UPC: Meril Group (60 cases)·Edwards Lifesciences Group (57 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CoA 530/2024·UPC CFI 255/2023·CC 585030/2023·UPC APP 19959/2024·UPC APP 7184/2024 and 1 more
12 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 202/2025·UPC CoA 166/2025·UPC CoA 21/2025·UPC CoA 27/2025·UPC CFI 815/2024 and 7 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2025-11-25Appeal RoP220.1Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed the Meril companies' appeals against the revocation and counterclaim revocation decisions and Edwards' appeal against the infringement decision, upholding the patent EP 3 646 825 (heart valve). Key rulings: (I–VIII) All revocation and counterclaim appeals rejected; Meril bears 60% of Edwards' costs in the revocation proceedings and Edwards bears 40% of Meril's costs. (IX–X) The infringement decision was partially set aside: the injunction and preliminary damages order do not extend to XL devices (30.5mm and 32mm) that had not been scheduled for implantation in a patient by 15 November 2024. Preliminary damages reduced to not exceed €363,000 for Meril India and Meril Germany. The value of the proceedings is €8,000,000.
Show the legal issues (6)
- Competence and same-parties rule (Art. 33(4) UPCA)
- Admissibility of application to amend patent (R. 49.2, 50.2 RoP)
- Claim construction
- Inventive step
- Scope of injunction (XL devices)
- Preliminary damages
- 2024-09-06
Summary: The Court of Appeal issued a procedural order in related appeals by Meril entities against Edwards Lifesciences, consolidating multiple appeals and addressing case management for the parallel infringement and counterclaim for revocation proceedings before the Central Division Paris.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Consolidated appeals
- Case management
- Counterclaim for revocation
- Transcatheter heart valve
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Communication | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Decision | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Decision | 2025-11-25 | Public |
| Communication | 2025-11-24 | Not public |
| Oral procedure closed | 2025-10-21 | Not public |
| Oral procedure opened | 2025-10-21 | Not public |
| Written procedure closed | 2025-10-21 | Not public |
| Hearing reference | 2025-09-16 | Not public |
| Hearing reference | 2025-09-16 | Not public |