View all cases
UPC CoA 489/2024
Aug 19, 2024·EP3342086: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LOW LATENCY TRANSMISSIONS
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain Appeal
- Parties
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Technology
- Telecommunications
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Sep 6, 2024
Decisions
- 2024-09-06DismissedAppeal decisionRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)
The Court of Appeal rejected Motorola's request for a discretionary review of a Munich Local Division order that had denied leave to change its claim, finding that Motorola had not demonstrated that review was necessary to ensure consistent application and interpretation of the Rules of Procedure.
Legal issues:Discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP)Leave to change claim (R. 263 RoP)Uniformity of UPC case law
Documents
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-09-09 | Not public |
| Procedural order | 2024-09-09 | Public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2024-09-06 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2024-09-06 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-09-06 | Not public |
| Final order | 2024-09-06 | Public |
| 2024-09-02 Response Ericsson discretionary review_signed | 2024-09-02 | Not public |
| 2024-09-02 Response Ericsson discretionary review_signed | 2024-09-02 | Not public |
| Procedural order | 2024-08-22 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2024-08-22 | Not public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2024-08-22 | Not public |
| Request for discretionary review | 2024-08-22 | Not public |
| Exhibit P RDR 3 | 2024-08-19 | Not public |
| Exhibit P RDR 2 | 2024-08-19 | Not public |
| Request for discretionary review | 2024-08-19 | Not public |
| Exhibit P RDR 2 | 2024-08-19 | Not public |
| Exhibit P RDR 4 | 2024-08-19 | Not public |
| Exhibit P RDR 4 | 2024-08-19 | Not public |
| Exhibit P RDR 1 | 2024-08-19 | Not public |