UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 54/2026

·EP2867997: WIRELESS INDUCTIVE POWER TRANSFER

Case details
Status
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tilman Müller (Bardehle Pagenberg, Hamburg, Germany)
Respondents
Reps: Joschua Fiedler (DLA PIPER UK LLP, Munich, Germany)
Division
Judges
Technology
Power Generation
Language
First decided
Apr 16, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-04-16
    Procedural onlyAppeal decisionAppeal RoP220.1

    The Court of Appeal denied Belkin's requests to extend the deadline for lodging the Statement of appeal and to issue a formal notice to remedy deficiencies under R.229.2 RoP. The Court held that the two-month time period for lodging a Statement of appeal (R.224.1(a) RoP) had not yet begun to run because the Court of First Instance issued its decision without reasons on 11 February 2026, and the period only starts when a reasoned decision is served. As no deadline had yet started, there was nothing to extend and no deficiency notice was required.

    Legal issues:Commencement of the time period for lodging a Statement of appeal under R.224.1(a) RoPWhether a decision without reasons triggers the appeal time periodExtension of appeal deadlines under R.9.3(a) RoPRequirement for reasoned decisions under Art.77(1) UPCA
Documents
  • order%2016-4-26%20extension%2054-2026.pdf2026-04-16EN
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • The two-month period for lodging a Statement of appeal (R.224.1(a) RoP) only begins to run when the CFI issues a decision including reasons, since the grounds are indispensable to formulate the order or remedy sought under R.225(e) RoP

    RespondentLegal basis: R.224.1(a) RoP; Art.77(1) UPCA; UPC_CoA_328/2024 (Ballino v Kinexon)
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Request to extend the deadline for the R.225(e) requirement until the deadline for lodging the Grounds of appeal

    RespondentLegal basis: R.9.4 RoP
  • In the alternative, request for a formal notice to remedy deficiencies pursuant to R.229.2 RoP

    RespondentLegal basis: R.229.2 RoP