UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Sep 19, 2024

UPC_CoA_540/2024

ENDOLUMINAL LASER ABLATION DEVICE FOR TREATING VEINS

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal
  • 2025-02-24PI deniedappeal_decisionAppeal RoP220.1

    Court of Appeal rejected Biolitec's appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's refusal to grant a preliminary injunction. The CoA upheld the first-instance order, finding that Biolitec had not demonstrated the necessity of provisional measures: proceedings on the merits could be awaited; the status quo on the market had existed for years before the patent was granted; and Biolitec failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence of urgency regarding stocking or tender-related harm. Biolitec was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.

  • 2025-02-24PI deniedappeal_decisionAppeal RoP220.1

    German-language signed version of the Court of Appeal order rejecting Biolitec's appeal in the provisional measures proceedings against Light Guide Optics and SIA LIGHTGUIDE International. Identical in substance to the English version: appeal rejected, Biolitec ordered to bear costs. The provisional injunction was denied because proceedings on the merits could be awaited and necessity was not demonstrated.