UPC CoA 569/2024
Sep 30, 2024·EP3797685 · SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND SENSOR ELECTRONICS UNIT COMMUNICATION
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dexcom Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Marcus Grosch-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Johannes Bukow-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Jérôme Kommer-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Katrin Gerstenberg-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Sebastian Scholz-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Laurin Haasis-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Peter Klusmann-Hoffmann Eitle
- David Sproston-Hoffmann Eitle
- Mark Jones-Hoffmann Eitle
Respondents- Abbott LaboratoriesOperating co.
- Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Operating co.
- Abbott GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Diagnostics GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Logistics B.V.Operating co.
- Abbott (S.A./N.V.)Operating co.
- Abbott s.r.l.Operating co.
- Abbott B.V.Operating co.
- Abbott Scandinavia AktiebolagOperating co.
- Abbott FranceOperating co.
Representatives- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Dietrich Kamlah-Taylor Wessing
- Christian Lederer-Taylor Wessing
- Gisbert Hohagen-Taylor Wessing
- Eelco Bergsma-Taylor Wessing
- François Pochart-August Debouzy
- Christian Dekoninck-Taylor Wessing
- Patricia Cappuyns-Taylor Wessing
- Thomas Adocker-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jan 24, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Rian Kalden | Locked |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
| Judge Patricia Rombach | Locked |
| Judge Hergen Kapels | Locked |
| Judge Udo Matter | Locked |
At the UPC: Dexcom Group (39 cases)·Abbott Group (67 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC APP 49196/2024·UPC APP 45331/2024·CC 586829/2023·CC 586960/2023·UPC CFI 230/2023 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2025-01-24
Summary: Court of Appeal order allowing withdrawal of the infringement appeal and counterclaim for revocation filed by DexCom against Abbott companies, pursuant to R. 265 RoP. The withdrawal was allowed, proceedings declared closed, and the impugned first-instance decision became ineffective. Court held that withdrawal may be filed in appeal proceedings, that withdrawal of a revocation counterclaim renders amendment requests ineffective, and that closure of proceedings renders the impugned decision ineffective.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Withdrawal of action (R. 265 RoP)
- Withdrawal in appeal proceedings
- Effect of withdrawal of counterclaim for revocation
- Reimbursement of court fees (R. 370.9 RoP)
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2025-09-24 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-12 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-01-24 | Not public |
| Close workflow | 2025-01-24 | Public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-01-24 | Not public |
| Reimbursement order | 2025-01-24 | Public |
| Withdrawal order | 2025-01-24 | Public |
| 2025-01-21-EP-685-consent-withdrawal-cc-DexCom-v-Abbott-CoA-53922-2024_CMS.pdf | 2025-01-21 | Not public |
| Extension order 20 January 2025 | 2025-01-20 | Not public |
| Consulting DexCom about Abbott's application to withdraw the counterclaim(s) | 2025-01-20 | Not public |