UPC CoA 621/2024

At the UPC: Daedalus Prime LLC (10 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)

• 2025-02-12
  Appeal RoP220.2Public

  Summary: Court of Appeal Panel 1a order on the scope of confidentiality protection (R. 262A RoP) in proceedings by Daedalus Prime LLC (appellant/claimant) against Xiaomi entities, with MediaTek as intervener, concerning EP 2 792 100. The order addresses whether US attorneys (non-EU, non-UPCA Art. 48 representatives) may be granted full access to confidential information. The Court held that R. 262A.6 RoP does not require persons accessing confidential information to be employees or Art. 48 UPCA representatives; access depends on necessity and trustworthiness assessed case by case.

  Show the legal issues (3)

  • Protection of confidential information (R. 262A RoP)
  • Access rights for non-EU / non-UPCA Art. 48 attorneys
  • Scope of confidentiality order in appeal proceedings
• 2025-01-08
  Application RoP313Public

  Summary: The Court of Appeal allowed MediaTek Inc.'s application to intervene as a party in the appeal proceedings (Daedalus Prime LLC v. Xiaomi) concerning an order restricting access to confidential information, and instructed MediaTek and Xiaomi to coordinate their submissions for the oral hearing.

  Show the legal issues (3)

  • Application to intervene in appeal proceedings under R. 313 RoP
  • Scope of third-party intervention rights
  • Confidentiality of information in appeal proceedings