UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Jul 8, 2025

UPC_CoA_631/2025

REFERENCE PICTURE SIGNALING

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 4

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
262Aprotection of confidential information — FRAND licence agreementsBindingFINAL ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court concerning an application for the protection of confidential information under R. 262A RoP
313.2admissibility of intervention — limited to relief sought by partyBindingPursuant to R. 313.2 RoP, an application to intervene is admissible only if it is made in support of a claim, order or remedy sought by one of the parties.
353rectification of obvious slips in ordersBindingPursuant to R. 353 the Court may, by way of order, of its own motion or on application by a party, after hearing the parties, rectify clerical mistakes, errors in calculation and obvious slips in the decision or order.
262Aconfidentiality / licensing barBackgroundOn 26 January 2026, the Court of Appeal issued an order concerning applications for the protection of confidential information under R. 262A RoP

UPC Court of Appeal · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
UPC_CoA_579/2025R.353 does not permit subsequent changes to Court's findingsPersuasiveR. 353 RoP, however, does not permit any subsequent changes to the Court's findings (UPC_CoA_579/2025, order of 3 February 2026, STEROS v OTEC, para. 9).
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.