UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CoA 64/2026

May 4, 2026·EP2437696 · SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING POSITION

Follow
Case details
Status
Interim Phase
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Jul 22, 2026
EPO Opposition
  • isarpatent - Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Behnisch Barth Charles Hassa Peckmann und Partner mbBWithdrawn2019-12-30
  • Philips International B.V.Admissible2020-01-03
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Klaus GrabinskiLocked
Judge Paolo CatallozziLocked
Judge Peter BlokLocked
Judge Christoph SchoberLocked
Judge Giorgio CheccacciLocked

At the UPC: Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc. (5 cases)·Philips Group (46 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

This dispute contains 4 other proceedings

UPC CoA 63/2026·UPC CFI 103/2025·UPC CFI 43/2025·UPC APP 32667/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2026

Decisions
  • 2026-07-22
    AppealPublic

    Summary: In the appeal against the Hague Local Division's decision of 3 March 2026 dismissing the infringement action and revoking EP 2 437 696, the Court of Appeal judge-rapporteur declined to decide at this stage whether the eleven additional auxiliary requests filed with the statement of grounds were validly introduced under Art. 73(4) UPCA and R. 222.2 RoP, reserving that question for a later stage of the appeal. The respondents' alternative request to have their deadline for a statement of response and cross-appeal fixed at three months from a future admissibility decision was rejected, since the content of the requests is already known to them.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • admissibility on appeal of auxiliary requests filed for the first time with the statement of grounds
    • Art. 73(4) UPCA and R. 222.2 RoP
    • whether admissibility should be determined separately in advance of the statement of response
    • extension of the deadline for a statement of response and cross-appeal
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Summons to oral hearing2026-10-14Not public
Order2026-10-14Not public
Receipt2026-10-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-12Not public
Document2026-10-12Not public
Receipt2026-10-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-12Not public
Document2026-10-12Not public
Interim procedure opened2026-10-07Not public
Written procedure closed2026-10-07Not public
Order2026-10-06Not public
Order2026-10-06Public
Receipt2026-10-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-05Not public
Exhibit Respondent2026-10-05Not public
Statement of Response2026-10-05Not public
Publication of order2026-07-23Not public
Order2026-07-22Not public
Order2026-07-22Public
Receipt2026-07-21Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-21Not public
Application Respondent2026-07-21Not public
Order2026-07-21Not public
Order2026-07-21Public
Order2026-07-21Public
Note2026-07-10Not public
Receipt2026-07-03Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-03Not public
Statement of the Grounds of Appeal2026-07-03Not public
Receipt2026-07-03Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Application Appellant2026-07-03Not public
Publication2026-05-06Not public
Receipt2026-05-04Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-04Not public
Other document Appellant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-05-04Not public
Statement of Appeal2026-05-04Not public