UPC CoA 691/2024
Nov 14, 2024·EP3320602 · ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE PROVIDED WITH A RESERVOIR OF LUBRICANT FOR LUBRICATING A ROLLING BEARING AND FOR COOLING THE MACHINE
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Magna PT s.r.o.Operating co.
- Magna PT B.V. & Co. KGOperating co.
- Magna International France, SARLOperating co.
Representatives- Klaus Haft-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Wolfgang Kellenter-Hengeler Mueller
- Matthias Rothkopf-Hengeler Mueller
- Sabine Agé-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Caroline Levesque-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Lonni Bas-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Laurène Borey-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Sebastian Kratzer-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Sven Krause-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Max von Leitner-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Elisa In den Birken-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Chiara Prinz-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- David Rüther-Hengeler Mueller
- Nina Mackenstedt-Hengeler Mueller
Respondents- Valeo ElectrificationOperating co.
Representatives- Felix Roediger-Bird & Bird LLP
- Tilmann Felix Roediger-Bird & Bird LLP
- Jonas Smeets-Bird & Bird LLP
- Fabian Saupe-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Nov 14, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Rian Kalden | Locked |
At the UPC: Magna Group (21 cases)·Valeo Group (34 cases)
This dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 719/2024·UPC CoA 689/2024·UPC CFI 657/2024·UPC CFI 459/2024·UPC CFI 347/2024 and 4 more
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2024-11-14Application RoP 223Public
Summary: Court of Appeal (Standing Judge Rian Kalden) granted suspensive effect to the appeal by Magna International France, Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG, and Magna PT s.r.o. over a preliminary injunction order (ORD_56545/2024) issued by Düsseldorf Local Division in favour of Valeo Electrification (EP 3 320 602). The suspensive effect was limited to the question whether the 'BMW 2 Series Gran Coupé' model was covered by the exception in the injunction, pending a CFI decision on a request for correction of an obvious slip in the injunction.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Suspensive effect of appeal under Rule 223.4 RoP
- Preliminary injunction covering automotive supply chain
- Obvious slip in injunction order under Rule 353 RoP
- BMW model exclusion from preliminary injunction
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2025-09-29 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-19 | Not public |
| Close workflow | 2025-02-19 | Public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-14 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2024-12-02 | Not public |
| R. 9 Application - Factual Corrections re Applicants R. 223 submission (EP602) | 2024-12-02 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-11-14 | Not public |
| order suspensive effect | 2024-11-14 | Public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2024-11-14 | Not public |
| Application R. 16.1 RgR | 2024-11-14 | Not public |