Overview · Filed: Aug 26, 2025
UPC_CoA_796/2025
BIOTELEMETRY DEVICE THAT CAN BE INGESTED AND IMPLANTED IN VIVO
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 11
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85.2 | language regime / expedited actions exception | Binding | In accordance with the provisions of Rule 85.2 RoP, Rule 91 RoP (interlocutory revision by the EPO) does not apply to an expedited action against a decision of the Office issued under Rule 97 RoP |
| 91 | interlocutory revision by EPO | Binding | Rule 91 RoP (interlocutory revision by the EPO) does not apply to an expedited action against a decision of the Office issued under Rule 97 RoP |
| 97 | annulment of EPO decision rejecting unitary effect request | Binding | Rule 97 RoP, as lex specialis, establishes the specific provisions applicable to an Application to annul a decision of the Office to reject a request for unitary effect. |
| 97.1 | three-week period for application for reversal | Binding | the three-week period within which an Application for reversal may be lodged against a decision taken by the EPO (Rule 97.1 RoP) |
| 97.4 | three-week period for standing judge decision | Binding | the three-week period within which the latter must decide the Application (Rule 97.4 RoP), an Application lodged under Rule 97 RoP constitutes an expedited action |
| 97.5 | three-week period for statement of appeal | Binding | In accordance with Rule 97.5 RoP (first sentence), a Statement of appeal by the patent proprietor or the President of the European Patent Office against the decisions of the standing judge pursuant to paragraph 4 may be filed within three weeks |
| 85.2 | exception actions accélérées / interlocutory revision EPO | Binding | Conformément aux dispositions de la Règle 85(2) RdP, la Règle 91 RdP (révision interlocutoire par l'OEB) ne s'applique pas à une action accélérée |
| 91 | révision interlocutoire par l'OEB | Binding | la Règle 91 RdP (révision interlocutoire par l'OEB) ne s'applique pas à une action accélérée contre une décision de l'Office rendue en vertu de la Règle 97 RdP |
| 97 | lex specialis pour demande d'annulation de décision de l'OEB | Binding | La Règle 97 RdP établit, en tant que lex specialis, les dispositions applicables à une demande d'annulation d'une décision prise par l'Office de rejet d'une demande d'effet unitaire. |
| 97.1 | délai de trois semaines pour demande d'infirmation | Binding | le délai de trois semaines dans lequel une demande d'infirmation peut être déposée à l'encontre d'une décision prise par l'OEB (R. 97.1 RdP) |
| 97.4 | délai de trois semaines pour décision du juge de permanence | Binding | du délai de trois semaines dans lequel ce dernier doit statuer sur celle-ci (R. 97.4 RdP), une demande déposée en vertu de la Règle 97 RdP constitue une action accélérée |
courtName.other · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 9 UP Regulation | EPO tasks under unitary patent regulation | Background | the Court may exercise any power entrusted on the EPO in accordance with Article 9 of the UP Regulation |
| Rule 7(3) UPR | one-month period to remedy deficiencies in unitary effect request | Binding | the time period for correcting deficiencies (Rule 7(3) UPR) is non-extendable; any extension of the time period would allow the beneficiary to profit from its own failure |
| Rule 7(3) UPR | délai d'un mois pour remédier aux irrégularités | Binding | le délai pour remédier aux irrégularités (R. 7(3) RPU) n'est pas prorogeable |
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 66 UPCA | powers of UPC concerning EPO decisions | Binding | In accordance with the provisions of Article 66 (Powers of the Court concerning decisions of the EPO) of the UPC Agreement, the Court may exercise any power entrusted on the EPO in accordance with Article 9 of the UP Regulation. |
| Article 66 UPCA | pouvoirs de la Juridiction concernant les décisions de l'OEB | Binding | Conformément aux dispositions de l'article 66 (pouvoirs de la Juridiction concernant les décisions de l'OEB) de l'Accord JUB, la Juridiction peut exercer tout pouvoir qui a été confié à l'O |
UPC (CFI) · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_628/2025 | impugned order of Central Division Milan on unitary effect request | Background | Order of the Central Division (Milan section) of 6 August 2025 References: UPC_CFI_628/2025 |
| UPC_CFI_628/2025 | ordonnance contestée de la Division Centrale (section de Milan) | Background | Ordonnance de la Division Centrale (section de Milan) du 6 août 2025 Référence : UPC_CFI_628/2025 |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.