UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Jan 19, 2026

UPC_CoA_8/2026

SECURITY MODULE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AND MONITORING THE DATA TRAFFIC OF A PERSONAL COMPUTER

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • PAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG
Reps: Jan Gigerich (IPCGS Gigerich Sedlmaier)

Respondents

  • European Patent Office
Reps: António Campinos (EPO (President))
Judges
  • Ingeborg Simonsson
Patents
  • EP3327608
  • EP 3 327 608
CPC codes: G06F21/123, G06F21/71, G06F21/606, G06F2221/2101, G06F21/566, H04L63/145, G06F21/85, G06F21/554, G06F21/109, G06F21/575

Sector: Computing & AI

Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: Jan 19, 2026
First decided: Feb 9, 2026
Language: German

German-language decision of the Court of Appeal (Standing Judge Simonsson) dismissing Papst Licensing's appeal against the Paris Central Division decision (UPC_CFI_1771/2025). The CoA confirmed that Art. 3(1) of Regulation 1257/2012 cannot be interpreted to allow registration of unitary effect for a patent that does not designate all participating member states (Malta was not designated). Papst's requests for preliminary rulings to the CJEU were rejected as unnecessary. Each party bears its own costs per Art. 66(2) UPCA.

Open on UPC Registry