UPC_CoA_883/2025

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
247	grounds for rehearing — fundamental procedural defect	Binding	R. 247(e and d) RoP (fundamental procedural defect)
245	application for rehearing	Binding	Rehearing (Art. 81(1) UPCA; R. 245 RoP); fundamental procedural defect
350	decision must contain grounds, facts and arguments	Binding	A decision of the Court shall contain the grounds for the decision and a statement of the facts and arguments on which the Court bases its decision (R. 350 RoP).
248.1	admissibility of rehearing application — prior objection requirement	Binding	According to R. 248.1 RoP, an Application for rehearing based on the ground of a fundamental procedural defect is only admissible where an objection in respect of the procedural defect was raised during the proceedings...

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
81	fundamental procedural defect as ground for rehearing	Binding	Requests for a rehearing based on a fundamental procedural defect pursuant to Art. 81(1)(b) UPCA and R. 247(e and d) RoP (fundamental procedural defect)
76	right to be heard — decisions may only be based on grounds submitted by parties	Binding	The right to be heard is reflected in Art. 76(2) UPCA, which provides that decisions on the merits may only be based on grounds, facts and evidence, which were submitted by the parties...
76	free evaluation of evidence by the court	Binding	The Court shall evaluate the evidence presented by the parties freely and independently (Art. 76(3) UPCA).

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_596/2025	prior CoA order (security for costs) under review for rehearing	Background	Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dated 12 July 2025, UPC_CoA_596/2025
UPC_CoA_363/2025	prior CoA decision (default) under review for rehearing	Background	Decision of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dated 12 July 2025, UPC_CoA_363/2025

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
C-129/13	fundamental procedural defect standard — same decision without defect	Binding	see judgment of 3 July 2014 in Kamino International Logistics and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics, C-129/13 and C130/13, EU:C:2014:2041, paragraph 79

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.