UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Oct 30, 2025

UPC_CoA_897/2025

SYSTEM FOR SECURING SHELF ACCESSORIES TO A SHELF

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 3

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
223application for suspensive effectBindingconcerning an application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP)
118.8enforcement of order / communication of informationBindingHL Display lodged a R. 118.8 RoP application on 16 October 2025 seeking the enforcement of (among other items) the part of the decision
191communication of information — reasoned requestBackgroundHL Display has never made a reasoned request in the sense of R. 191 RoP, and the information is not reasonably necessary for the purpose of advancing HL Display's case.

EPC article · 2

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
74appeal does not have suspensive effect by defaultBindingPursuant to Article 74(1) UPCA, an appeal shall not have suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise at the motivated request of one of the parties.
67right to information — scopeBindingCategories d ‐ f do not have any basis in Art. 67 UPCA and thus cannot be awarded based on this legal provision.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.