Overview · Filed: Oct 30, 2025
UPC_CoA_897/2025
SYSTEM FOR SECURING SHELF ACCESSORIES TO A SHELF
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 223 | application for suspensive effect | Binding | concerning an application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) |
| 118.8 | enforcement of order / communication of information | Binding | HL Display lodged a R. 118.8 RoP application on 16 October 2025 seeking the enforcement of (among other items) the part of the decision |
| 191 | communication of information — reasoned request | Background | HL Display has never made a reasoned request in the sense of R. 191 RoP, and the information is not reasonably necessary for the purpose of advancing HL Display's case. |
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | appeal does not have suspensive effect by default | Binding | Pursuant to Article 74(1) UPCA, an appeal shall not have suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise at the motivated request of one of the parties. |
| 67 | right to information — scope | Binding | Categories d ‐ f do not have any basis in Art. 67 UPCA and thus cannot be awarded based on this legal provision. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.