UPC_CoA_900/2025

Braided medical device and manufacturing method therefore

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealOral Phase

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
223	application for suspensive effect	Binding	includes an application for suspensive effect under R. 223 RoP.
223.4	standing judge to decide application without delay	Binding	Lepu requests that the Court of Appeal decide the application for suspensive effect on an expedited basis and, if necessary, permit the standing judge to decide the application without delay under R. 223.4 RoP.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_301/2024	test for suspensive effect — manifestly erroneous impugned order or appeal devoid of purpose	Binding	Court of Appeal 19 June 2024, UPC_CoA_301/2024 APL_33746/2024 App_35055/2024 - ICPillar vs. ARM

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
74	appeal does not have suspensive effect by default	Binding	Pursuant to Article 74(1) UPCA, an appeal shall not have suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise at the motivated request of one of the parties.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.