UPC_CoA_904/2025

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TERMINAL DEVICE, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BASE STATION DEVICE, AND RESOURCE REGION SETTING METHOD

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
19	preliminary objection to jurisdiction	Binding	ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court concerning a Preliminary objection (R.19 RoP)
20.2	judge-rapporteur deferral of preliminary objection to main proceedings	Binding	The decision to deal with the Preliminary objection in the main proceedings may be taken either by the judge-rapporteur, as laid down in R. 20.2 RoP, or by the panel
102.1	judge-rapporteur may refer any matter to the panel	Binding	This follows from the first part of R. 102.1 RoP, according to which the judge-rapporteur may refer any matter to the panel for decision.
331	responsibility for case management during written and interim procedure	Binding	This is further confirmed by R. 331 RoP on the responsibility for case management which provides that (R. 331.1 RoP) during the written procedure and the interim procedure, case management shall be the responsibility of the judge-rapporteur

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
32	jurisdiction of the UPC	Binding	Competence of the Court, Preliminary objection; UPCA Art. 32, R. 19 and 20 RoP.
41	procedural efficiency and cost-effectiveness	Background	deferring the jurisdiction issue to the main proceedings ensures procedural efficiency and cost-effectiveness in according to Art. 41(3) UPCA.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_904/2025	prior order rejecting stay/extension of time for SoD in same case	Background	VIVO also requested to stay the main proceedings or, alternatively, to extend the terms for filing the SoD, which was rejected by the Court of Appeal (CoA Order of 27 November 2025).

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Cited in	Date	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_904/2025 Court of Appeal	Mar 16, 2026	prior order rejecting stay/extension of time for SoD in same case	Background	VIVO also requested to stay the main proceedings or, alternatively, to extend the terms for filing the SoD, which was rejected by the Court of Appeal (CoA Order of 27 November 2025).