UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Dec 19, 2025

UPC_CoA_930/2025

FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • Insulet Corporation
Reps: Marc Grunwald (Peterreins Schley)

Respondents

  • EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
Reps: Mirko Weinert (Hoyng ROKH Monegier)
Judges
  • Rian Kalden
  • Patricia Rombach
  • Ingeborg Simonsson
  • Udo Matter
  • Steven Kitchen
Patents
  • EP4201327
  • EP 4 201 327
CPC codes: A61M5/1723, A61M5/1452, A61M5/158, A61B5/14865, A61M5/14244, F04B9/02, A61B5/14532, A61M2230/201, A61M2005/14506, A61M5/14248, B65D83/761, A61M5/3291

Sector: Packaging & Conveying

Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: Dec 19, 2025
First decided: Jan 29, 2026
Last decision: Mar 18, 2026
Language: English

The Court of Appeal dismissed EOFlow's appeal against the Milan Central Division's order denying EOFlow's request under R. 262.2 RoP to keep certain information confidential. The Court held that information disclosed to the opposing party without an order under R. 262A RoP or other restriction loses its character as a trade secret. A R. 262.2 RoP request does not automatically protect information from disclosure by the other party. Information relating to a settlement agreement was also no longer confidential because its substance had already been stated in the published court order.

Open on UPC Registry