ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 1Decisions 4Judges 2Parties 1Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

Applicant in failed PI proceedings may be ordered to pay interim cost award (R. 211.1(d) RoP)

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

Applicant in failed PI proceedings may be ordered to pay interim cost award (R. 211.1(d) RoP)

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Decisions

Legal principleApplicant in failed PI proceedings may be ordered to pay interim cost award (R. 211.1(d) RoP)Clear all

Date	Case	Division	Action	Motion	Outcome	Summary
2025-10-22	UPC_CFI_587/2025	The Hague LD	Application for provisional measures	Preliminary injunction	PI denied	The Hague Local Division dismissed Abbott Diabetes Care's application for provisional measures against Sinocare and A.Menarini Diagnostics concerning EP 3 988 471, finding that the GlucoMen iCan device does not infringe claim 1 because event data icons are displayed in a separate panel rather than within the timeline graph.