ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 1Decisions 4Judges 3Parties 3Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

priority: 'same invention' standard under Art. 87 EPC equated to added matter disclosure standard

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

priority: 'same invention' standard under Art. 87 EPC equated to added matter disclosure standard

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Decisions

Legal principlepriority: 'same invention' standard under Art. 87 EPC equated to added matter disclosure standard Clear all

Date	Case	Division	Action	Motion	Outcome	Summary
2025-10-15	UPC_CFI_115/2025	Dusseldorf LD	Generic Order	Revocation merits	Partially revoked	The Düsseldorf Local Division found that the infringement action failed (patent not infringed) while partially upholding the defendants' counterclaim for revocation: the patent EP 2 755 901 B1 (egg packaging) was revoked in part, with the counterclaim otherwise dismissed. Priority, inventive step, and equivalence were the key issues.